Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality scoring based on the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale: cohort studies

From: A systematic review of CD14 and toll-like receptors in relation to asthma in Caucasian children

First author

Year

S1

S2

S3

S4

C1a

C1b

O1

O2

O3

OQ

Bieli † [10]

2007

*

*

*

-

*

*

-

*

-

+/−

Bottema [26]

2010

*

*

NA

*

-

-

-

*

-

+/−

Custovic [62]

2011

*

*

-

*

*

*

-

*

*

+

Eder † [25]

2004

*

*

*

-

*

*

-

*

-

+/−

Ege † [22]

2007

*

*

*

-

*

*

-

*

-

+/−

Fageras Bottcher † [39]

2004

-

*

*

-

*

*

*

*

-

+/−

Guerra [11]

2004

*

*

-

*

*

*

-

-

-

+/−

Jones [48]

2002

-

*

NA

*

-

-

-

-

-

–

Kabesch † [13]

2004

*

*

NA

*

-

-

-

*

-

+/−

Kerkhof [56]

2010

*

*

*

*

*

*

-

*

-

+

Lange [63]

2011

*

*

NA

-

*

*

*

*

-

+

Lodrup Carlsen [51]

2010

*

*

NA

*

*

*

-

*

*

+

O’Donnell [36]

2004

*

*

NA

-

*

*

-

*

*

+

Reijmerink [41]

2010

*

*

NA

*

-

-

-

*

-

+/−

Rothenbacher [53]

2005

*

*

*

*

*

*

-

-

*

+

Simpson [8]

2006

*

*

*

*

*

*

-

*

*

+

Snijders † [52]

2006

*

*

*

*

*

*

-

-

*

+

Soferman [54]

2004

-

*

NA

*

*

*

*

*

*

+

  1. S1: Representativeness of the exposed cohort, S2: Selection of non-exposed cohort, S3: Ascertainment of exposure, S4: Outcome of interest not present at start of study, C1a/C1b: Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis, O1: Assessment of outcome, O2: Duration of follow-up, O3: Adequacy of follow up (*: criteria were met; -: criteria were not met); OQ: Overall quality (+ better than average quality, +/− average quality, – less than average quality); NA = not applicable; † cross-sectional study.