Skip to main content

Table 2 Sub-optimal knowledge reported by healthcare providers

From: A multi-stakeholder perspective on asthma care in Canada: findings from a mixed methods needs assessment in the treatment and management of asthma in adults

Knowledge area

% (n) of participants who reported sub-optimal knowledge in relation to what it should be, given their professional rolea

GP/FPs. (n = 79)

SPE. (n = 18)

CRE. (n = 21)

Nurses (n = 18)

Pharm. (n = 54)

Total (n = 190)

Significant differencesb

Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) guidelines

52%c (n = 41)

28%c (n = 5)

67% (n = 14)

83% (n = 15)

87%c (n = 47)

64% (n = 122)

p < 0.001

Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines

77% (n = 61)

33% (n = 6)

57% (n = 12)

94% (n = 17)

93% (n = 50)

77% (n = 146)

NV

Indicators to request or conduct a spirometry test

33%c (n = 26)

22% (n = 4)

38% (n = 8)

44% (n = 8)

89%c (n = 48)

50% (n = 94)

p < 0.001

Respective responsibilities of healthcare team members regarding patient education, in my practice setting

27% (n = 21)

22% (n = 4)

24% (n = 5)

44% (n = 8)

41% (n = 22)

32% (n = 60)

NS

  1. GP general practitioner, FP family physician, SPE specialist, CRE Certified Respiratory Educator, Pharm community pharmacist, NS not significant, NV Chi square not valid due to distribution
  2. aSelf-reported 1–3 on a 5-pt scale, where 1 = low, given my professional role 3 = acceptable, but could be improved, given my professional role and 5 = optimal, given my professional role
  3. bSignificant differences between professions using Chi square (p < 0.05)
  4. cPost hoc test indicated for statistical difference