Skip to main content

Table 5 Comments from parents and teachers of school age children: does banning allergenic foods make allergic students safe?

From: It takes a village: perceptions of Winnipeg parents, students, teachers and school staff regarding the impact of food allergy on school-age students and their families

Responses, reasons and concerns

Parents of children with and without food allergy N = 179 (%a)

Teachers and school staff N = 90 (%a)

P value

Support banning foods

31 (17%)

13 (14%)

0.26

 Teacher workload decreased

 Lower risk of reactions

 Request for non-food reward

 Parents take responsibility for health

Concern with number of foods banned

26 (14%)

3 (3%)

0.002

 Only some allergenic foods banned

 Picky eaters or cultural preferences

 Higher cost of allowed foods

 Restrictions in classes with no allergy

 Punishment for accidental allergens

Issues different at different ages

28 (16%)

12 (13%)

0.29

 Needs change with age

 May give a false/temporary sense of security

Adherence concerns

45 (25%)

26 (29%)

0.23

 Families will not adhere to banning

 Families of children without food allergy do not avoid food allergens effectively

 Families of children without food allergy request more information

Banning is no guarantee of safety

47 (26%)

39 (43%)

0.002

 Prefer allergen aware vs. allergen free

 Previous outside consumption

Against banning

45 (25%)

16 (18%)

0.09

 Restaurant/grocery higher risk

 Ineffective/more reactions

 Prefer education/adequate cleaning

 Safety/responsibility start at home

 Support segregation by table or class

  1. aPercent excluding non-responders