Skip to main content

Table 4 Dose modifications among patients receiving any LTP treatment

From: A multicenter chart review of patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in hereditary angioedema: unmet need for more effective long-term prophylaxis

 

Overall (N = 121)

US (n = 34)

Canada (n = 33)

Germany (n = 13)

Australia (n = 19)

UK (n = 21)

Italy (n = 1)

Patients with any dose modification

42 (34.7)

15 (44.1)

13 (39.4)

2 (15.4)

4 (21.1)

8 (38.1)

0

Patients with any up-dosinga

30 (24.8)

10 (29.4)

13 (39.4)

0

2 (10.5)

5 (23.8)

0

Berinert®

n = 31

n = 2

n = 17

n = 4

n = 7

n = 1

n = 0

 Dose modification

8 (25.8)

0

6 (35.3)

0

2 (28.6)

0

NA

 Up-dosing

8 (25.8)

0

6 (35.3)

0

2 (28.6)

0

NA

Cinryze®

n = 36

n = 21

n = 6

n = 7

n = 0

n = 2

n = 0

 Dose modification

13 (36.1)

12 (57.1)

1 (16.7)

0

NA

0

NA

 Up-dosing

9 (25.0)

8 (38.1)

1 (16.7)

0

NA

0

NA

Danazol

n = 65

n = 15

n = 19

n = 2

n = 11

n = 18

n = 0

 Dose modification

21 (32.3)

4 (26.7)

6 (31.6)

1 (50.0)

2 (18.2)

8 (44.4)

NA

 Up-dosing

13 (20.0)

2 (13.3)

6 (31.6)

0

0

5 (27.8)

NA

Tranexamic acid

n = 15

n = 0

n = 5

n = 0

n = 7

n = 2

n = 1

 Dose modification

3 (20.0)

NA

3 (60.0)

NA

0

0

0

 Up-dosing

3 (20.0)

NA

3 (60.0)

NA

0

0

0

Lanadelumab

n = 11

n = 7

n = 0

n = 4

n = 0

n = 0

n = 0

 Dose modification

1 (9.1)

0

NA

1 (25.0)

NA

NA

NA

 Up-dosing

0

NA

0

0

NA

NA

NA

  1. Percentages were calculated on the basis of number of patients using each type of LTP
  2. LTP long-term prophylaxis, NA not applicable
  3. aUp-dosing includes increased dose and increased dosing frequency