Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias assessments for each criterion using the NHLBI tool for case series studies

From: Effectiveness of immunoglobulin replacement therapy in preventing infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

Study

Was the study question clearly stated?

Was the study population clearly described?

Were the cases consecutive?

Were the subjects comparable?

Was the intervention clearly described?

Were the outcomes clearly defined, valid, reliable, and applied consistently?

Was the length of the follow-up adequate?

Were the statistical methods well described?

Were the results well described?

Quality of Study

Baleeiro and Mull32

Yes

No

NR

No

No

No

NR

No

No

Poor

Cowan et al33

Yes

Yes

NR

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Good

McCullagh et al34

Yes

Yes

NR

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Good

  1. NR, not reported