Volume 6 Supplement 4

Knowledge transfer in primary care: the model of allergic respiratory diseases

Open Access

Introduction

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology20106(Suppl 4):A1

DOI: 10.1186/1710-1492-6-S4-A1

Published: 10 December 2010

A Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) can be defined as a “systematically developed statement to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances” [1, 2]. These guidelines help summarize research findings, provide guidance on management of various conditions, and support quality control measures [3].

They usually include a review of current knowledge, following a systematic search for evidence on a specific topic, and provide graded recommendations to guide the clinician, particularly for primary care settings [4, 5]. Unfortunately, guidelines implementation is often still sub-optimal, particularly for chronic diseases [4, 68]. In the last decade, research in the field of Knowledge Transfer/Translation (KT) has identified possible strategies to improve the uptake of guidelines [9, 10].

This report of the proceedings of a Canada-Sweden symposium held in Quebec City, Canada, on 7 May 2010, provides a brief overview of various components of CPG implementation, particularly on allergic respiratory diseases. The main objectives of the symposium were to: 1) Review barriers and facilitators of KT and guidelines implementation for primary care, 2) Discuss current status and recent initiatives in regard to allergy and asthma guidelines implementation in Canada and Sweden, 3) Elaborate on how to improve guidelines implementation at the patient level, for example using shared-decision interventions, and 4) Suggest models of evaluation of KT and implementation programs.

Hopefully, this summary of the presentations will bring useful information to the attention of all those interested in KT and promote new initiatives, particularly for primary care, to improve guideline implementation and evaluation of the results of these interventions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Laval University Chair on Knowledge Transfer, Education and Prevention in Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health, Québec

References

  1. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Edited by: Field MJ, Lohr KN. 1990, Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Wollersheim H, Burgers J, Grol R: Clinical guidelines to improve patient care. Neth J Med. 2005, 63: 188-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A: Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999, 318: 527-30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulet LP: Asthma guidelines and outcomes. Middleton’s Allergy Principles and Practice. Edited by: Adkinson NF et al. 2003, Mosby, 2: 1283-1301. 6Google Scholar
  5. Davis D: Clinical practice guidelines and the translation of knowledge: the science of continuing medical education. CMAJ. 2000, 163: 1278-9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulet L, A Becker, D Bowie, A McIvor, P Hernandez, M Rouleau: Implementing Practice Guidelines: A workshop on guidelines dissemination and implementation with a focus on asthma and COPD. Can Respir J. 2006, 13 (A): 5-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jin R, Choi BC, Chan BT, McRae L, Li F, Cicutto L, Boulet LP, Mitchell I, Beveridge R, Leith E: Physician asthma management practices in Canada. Can Respir J. 2000, 7: 456-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baiardini I, Braido F, Bonini M, Compalati E, Canonica GW: Why do doctors and patients not follow guidelines?. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009, 9: 228-33. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32832b4651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Grol R, Grimshaw J: From best evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003, 362: 1225-30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gross PA, Greenfield S, Cretin S, Ferguson J, Grimshaw J, Grol R, Klazinga N, Lorenz W, Meyer GS, Riccobono C, Schoenbaum SC, Schyve P, Shaw C: Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care. 2001, 39: II85-II92.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Boulet; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement