Volume 10 Supplement 2

Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and AllerGen Abstracts 2014

Open Access

An overview of the advanced data collection techniques in the environmental exposure unit (EEU)

  • Daniel E Adams1,
  • Barnaby Hobsbawn1,
  • Terry JB Walker1,
  • Lisa M Steacy1 and
  • Anne K Ellis1, 2
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology201410(Suppl 2):A1

https://doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-10-S2-A1

Published: 18 December 2014

Background

Capturing symptom data for large studies (≥60 participants) in ≤30 minutes is hard to achieve using manual data entry without substantial costs and resources. This challenge is highlighted if the data are needed to make real-time clinical decisions. The 140 participant capacity of the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) requires an advanced method to process symptom data.

Methods

Advanced scanning technologies are used with a customized two-step quality assurance data collection process. Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capture data from paper symptom diary cards into the EEU’s clinical data management system (CDMS). A template is configured to read the static diary card format and assign zones where the specific diary card data are located. The user configures field requirements within the zones to validate data captured. Cards that do not meet a predefined confidence level for any particular zone will be flagged for a quality check. The quality checking process involves one user visually confirming all data captured and a second user inputting all values from the card to ensure accuracy. Invalid data are rejected from the batch and returned to the participant for correction. Corrected cards are scanned again and all valid data are transferred into the CDMS.

Results

Capturing data using the advanced scanning system allows a team of 3 to process 120 symptom diary cards containing 9 symptoms and 3 peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) scores, with 99.9% accuracy in <15 minutes. In comparison, manual data entry would require a team of 8 to achieve similar results.

Conclusions

For large studies with short assessment periods, the scanning system utilized in the EEU is significantly more efficient in all aspects of data acquisition than manual entry. This ability to accommodate large studies in an accurate, efficient manner leads to an ideal setting for the conduct of time-sensitive clinical trials.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital
(2)
Department of Medicine, Queen’s University

Copyright

© Adams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement