Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the Delphi survey Section 3: follow-up

From: Consensus on the management of united airways disease with type 2 inflammation: a multidisciplinary Delphi study

Number

Statement

Median

Appropriateness

Consensus/ round

1

Biomarkers associated with type 2 inflammation that are useful for the follow-up of patients with severe asthma and CRSwNP treated with biologics are:

1.1

Peripheral blood eosinophil count

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

1.2

Tissue eosinophil count (sputum, nasal polyp biopsy, bronchial biopsy)

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

1.3

FeNO

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

1.4

Serum total IgE

7.5

Appropriate

No (controversy)/2nd

1.5

Specific IgE (in serum or by intra-epidermal test or Prick test)

5

Uncertain

No (controversy)/2nd

2

In patients with severe type asthma and CRSwNP, it is recommended to record the following biomarkers to monitor the response to treatment with biologics:

2.1

Serum total IgE

8

Appropriate

No (controversy)/2nd

2.2

Peripheral blood eosinophil count

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

2.3

Tissue eosinophil count (in nasal polyps)

8

Appropriate

Yes/2nd

2.4

FeNO

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

3

The same biomarkers and clinical criteria used at the time of biologic prescription should be used to monitor these patients.

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

4

In patients with type 2 asthma (severe) and CRSwNP on biologics, the presence of elevated FeNO increases the risk of developing exacerbations.

7

Appropriate

Yes/2nd

5

In patients with severe type 2 asthma and CRSwNP, any professional, regardless of their specialty, must be aware of the results of the different biomarkers and clinical markers of both diseases to ensure correct management.

9

Appropriate

Yes/1st

6

In patients with type 2 CRSwNP (severe) and asthma, the following biomarkers and clinical markers determine the lack of response to ESS and thus recurrence of CRSwNP:

6.1

Tissue eosinophil count

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

6.2

Peripheral blood eosinophil count

7

Appropriate

No (controversy)/2nd

6.3

Anosmia (by VAS or smell test)

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

6.4

Quality of life (SNOT-22)

8

Appropriate

Yes/1st

7

The optimal time for assessing response to a biologic in patients with severe type 2 asthma and CRSwNP is 12 months.

8

Appropriate

Yes/2nd

8

The minimum time for assessing response to a biologic in patients with severe type 2 asthma and CRSwNP is 6 months.

9

Appropriate

Yes/1st

  1. Physicians rated their agreement with the statements using a 9-point Likert scale (1, totally disagree; 9, totally agree). Statements were classified as inappropriate, uncertain, or appropriate when median ranged from 1 to 3, 4–6, or 7–9, respectively. Consensus was achieved when at least two-thirds of the panel scored within any of the ranges, otherwise it was deemed as absence of consensus. Controversy was considered when more than one third of individual scores were within the range opposite the one containing the median.
  2. CRSwNP, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis; FeNO, fraction exhaled of nitric oxide; SNOT-22, Sino Nasal Outcome Test − 22; VAS, visual analogue scale.