Skip to main content

Dissemination and implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian experience

The Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) started an ambitious dissemination and implementation program (D&I) in 1999 [1]. Recent data show that control of hypertension in Canada has recently improved dramatically from 13% in 1992 [2] to 66% in 2008 [35]. Improved hypertension control from survey data is supported by and consistent with the data of declining Canadian standardized yearly mortality and hospitalization rates for the complications of hypertension - stroke, heart failure and acute myocardial infarction [5, 6]. This achievement makes Canada a world leader in treatment and control of hypertension.

CHEP’s D&I program includes three components: dissemination, implementation and addressing barriers. Dissemination has been achieved through a passive-to-active dissemination process by publishing in multiple formats - peer-reviewed and non peer-reviewed - with content tailored to end users, including patients and their families. Another important aspect has been the development of tools to help professionals in daily decision making for the management of hypertension [1].

Implementation happens when the information is used locally and barriers to the translation of such information are addressed. Characteristics of D&I programs usually include the following elements: multifaceted, multiple audiences, multimedia, consistent information and messages; sustainable, credible, using the appropriate language, and realistic and applicable. Each barrier is specific and should be addressed individually. A barrier can be, for example, related to access to professional services, diagnostic procedures, specific therapeutic procedures or different provincial/local regulations. Some barriers may be local or systemic (for example salt/sodium added in processed food) or absence of structured care in the management of chronic diseases.

In our experience, critical success factors for guidelines implementation are: a strong methodology for the development of high quality recommendations, an annual review of the scientific literature, and endorsement and participation of leading experts and key opinion leaders.

Items listed on Table 1 can probably explain CHEP’s success.

Table 1

References

  1. 1.

    Drouin D, Campbell NR, Kaczorowski J: Implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian Hypertension Education Program. Can J Cardiol. 2006, 22: 595-598.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Joffres MR, Ghadirian P, Fodor JG, Petrasovits A, Chockalingam A, Hamet P: Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Canada. Am J Hypertens. 1997, 10: 1097-1102. 10.1016/S0895-7061(97)00224-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Campbell NR, McAlister FA, Brant R, Levine M, Drouin D, Feldman R, Herman R, Zarnke K: Temporal trends in antihypertensive drug prescriptions in Canada before and after introduction of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program. J Hypertens. 2003, Canadian Hypertension Education Process and Evaluation Committee, 21: 1591-7. 10.1097/00004872-200308000-00025.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds Kristi, Whelton Paul K, He Jiang: Worldwide prevalence of hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2004, 22: 11-19. 10.1097/00004872-200401000-00003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wilkins K, Campbell NRC, Joffres MR, McAlister FA, Nichol M, Quach S, Johansen HL, Tremblay MS: Blood pressure in Canadian adults. Health Reports. 2010, 21: 37-46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Campbell NRC, Brant R, Johansen H, Walker RL, Wielgosz A, Onysko J, Gao RN, Sambell C, Phillips S, McAlister FA: Canadian Hypertension Education Program Outcomes Research Task F. Increases in antihypertensive prescriptions and reductions in cardiovascular events in Canada. Hypertension. 2009, 53: 128-134. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119784.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Drouin.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drouin, D. Dissemination and implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian experience. All Asth Clin Immun 6, A10 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-6-S4-A10

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction
  • Knowledge Translation
  • Opinion Leader
  • Business Plan
  • Guideline Implementation