- Case report
- Open Access
- Published:
Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis: a case report and literature review
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology volumeĀ 16, ArticleĀ number:Ā 2 (2020)
Abstract
Background
Oral mite anaphylaxis (OMA) is a condition characterized by severe allergic reactions after ingesting food containing dust mite-contaminated flour. Physical exertion is recognized as a common trigger factor inducing anaphylaxis. The association of OMA with exercise-induced anaphylaxis has rarely been reported.
Case presentation
We report a 29-year-old Thai woman who had dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis who tolerated the same bag of contaminated flour without exercise. A sample of contaminated cooking flour was examined under a light microscope. Living mites, Dermatophagoides farinae, were detected by a medical entomologist based on the morphology. We performed skin test to both mite-contaminated and newly opened GogiĀ® cooking flour, common aeroallergens, food allergens, and all other ingredients in the fried coconut rice cake 5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode. Specific IgE tests, using ImmunoCAP were also performed.
Conclusions
Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis may be misdiagnosed as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis and should be suspected in patients with anaphylaxis linked to food intake and exercise, but who have no apparent evidence to the index food ingredients on allergy workup.
Background
Oral mite anaphylaxis (OMA) is a condition characterized by severe allergic reactions after ingesting food containing dust mite-contaminated flour [1, 2]. Physical exertion is recognized as a common trigger factor inducing anaphylaxis [3, 4]. The association of OMA with exercise-induced anaphylaxis has rarely been reported [5, 6]. It may be misdiagnosed as wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.
Case presentation
We report a 29-year-old Thai woman who had dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis who tolerated the same bag of contaminated flour without exercise. She had moderate to severe, persistent allergic rhinitis since the age of 5, which was controlled by intranasal corticosteroid. Before the anaphylactic event occurred, she ate 10 pieces of fried coconut rice cake using mixed cooking flour (GogiĀ®) (Fig.Ā 1a). Sixty minutes later, she began to jog along the road as a daily routine. Twenty minutes after jogging, she developed itchy palms and feet, followed by bilateral nasal congestion. She immediately sought medical attention for these symptoms. She then developed swollen eyelids, eye redness, watery rhinorrhea, chest tightness, and difficulty breathing.
In the emergency room, her vital signs were a blood pressure of 94/62Ā mmHg, a heart rate of 110 beats per minute, a respiratory rate of 24 times per minute, and an oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Physical examination revealed angioedema of eyelids as well as generalized wheals and flares. The lungs were clear to auscultation. She was diagnosed with anaphylaxis, and food was suspected as a causative agent. Intramuscular epinephrine was administered. All symptoms improved on the first day. She had a biphasic reaction with mild recurrent eyelid angioedema the next day, which completely recovered within 24Ā h.
She was generally well the day before the anaphylactic event. She denied taking medications and denied history of drug allergy. She could take ibuprofen and diclofenac without any adverse reaction. One week before the anaphylactic episode, she could tolerate 15 pieces of fried coconut rice cake using the same bag of mixed cooking flour which had been opened and stored at room temperature for 2Ā months.
A sample of contaminated cooking flour was examined under a light microscope. Living mites, Dermatophagoides farinae, were detected by a medical entomologist based on the morphology (Fig.Ā 1b). We performed skin test to both mite-contaminated and newly opened GogiĀ® cooking flour, common aeroallergens, food allergens, and all other ingredients in the fried coconut rice cake 5 weeks after the anaphylactic episode. Specific IgE tests, using ImmunoCAP (Phadia AB, Upsala, Sweden), were also performed. The results of allergologic tests are summarized in Table 1.
Discussion and conclusions
We report a case of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a Thai patient. Most reported OMA cases developed symptoms immediately after eating mite-contaminated foods, but they can occur during physical exercise after the oral ingestion of the mites [6]. A recent review included 145 OMA cases from various regions [1]. However, dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis has only been reported twice [5, 6]. To the best of our knowledge, our report is the third reported case of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. We did not perform mite-contaminated food combined with exercise challenges due to the safety issue. However, 1 week before the anaphylactic event, our patient could tolerate the same bag of mite-infested flour without exercise at home.
An alternative explanation is house dust mite allergen level in the cooking flour could have increased with mite propagation [7]. However, the patient could tolerate 15 pieces of fried coconut rice cake without any reaction 1 week prior to the anaphylactic event compared with the 10 pieces associated with the event with exercise. Both the quantity of the food ingested and the 1-week interval of mite population increase should not have caused a significant increase in mite allergen ingestion associated with the anaphylactic event. This emphasizes the role of exercise as a cofactor to develop anaphylaxis in a patient who ingests mite-infested food. This reaction appears to be caused by heat-stable allergens, as cooking the flour does not seem to make a difference in terms of reactions in our case which is similar to the previous report [1].
OMA is associated with hypersensitivity to aspirin and NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). A high prevalence of house dust mite allergic rhinitis and/or asthma has been observed in OMA patients [2, 8]. Although our patient had house dust mite allergic rhinitis, she had no NSAIDs hypersensitivity, which is similar to the two previously reported cases (Table 2). Whether NSAIDs could also be a cofactor for anaphylaxis development without exercise after ingesting mite-infested food similar to FDEIA (Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis) has not been well established [3].
OMA is observed more frequently in geographical locations with high temperatures and relative humidity, favoring mite propagation. A series of OMA cases were reported from Venezuela, Spain, and Japan [1]. OMA is likely to be underreported in many countries with long periods of warm and humid weather, including Thailand. This condition is often overlooked and may be misdiagnosed as idiopathic anaphylaxis. The differential diagnoses include wheat allergy, allergy to hidden food allergens, food additives, and non-food allergens (e.g. drugs) [1]. In the case of suspicion of dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis, FDEIA should be excluded before making a diagnosis. OMA should be considered in mite allergic patients with food-induced allergic reaction who have no apparent allergy to the index food ingredients [6]. The diagnostic criteria for OMA were recently reviewed [1].
āGogiĀ®ā is a well-known brand of cooking flours in Thailand which is composed of 90% wheat, 6% tapioca, 3% baking powder, and 1% of trace component. The previous report demonstrated that dust mite infestation of flour was dependent on the presence of wheat and a high ambient temperature in tropical regions [9]. It is recommended that cooking flours be kept in the refrigerator using sealed glass containers or plastic bottles. In tropical regions, it is recommended that cooking flour be kept refrigerated for no longer than 6 weeks to prevent significant mite propagation [1].
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- FDEIA:
-
food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis
- IgE:
-
immunoglobulin E
- kAU/L:
-
kilo allergy unit per liter
- mmHg:
-
millimetre of mercury
- NSAIDs:
-
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- OMA:
-
oral mite anaphylaxis
References
Sanchez-Borges M, Fernandez-Caldas E. Hidden allergens and oral mite anaphylaxis: the pancake syndrome revisited. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;15(4):337ā43.
Sanchez-Borges M, Fernandez-Caldas E, Thomas WR, Chapman MD, Lee BW, Caraballo L, et al. International consensus (ICON) on: clinical consequences of mite hypersensitivity, a global problem. World Allergy Organ J. 2017;10(1):14.
Christensen MJ, Eller E, Mortz CG, Brockow K, Bindslev-Jensen C. Wheat-dependent cofactor-augmented anaphylaxis: a prospective study of exercise, aspirin, and alcohol efficacy as cofactors. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):114ā21.
Sanchez-Borges M, Caballero-Fonseca F, Capriles-Hulett A. Cofactors and comorbidities in patients with aspirin/NSAID hypersensitivity. Allergol Immunopathol. 2017;45(6):573ā8.
Sanchez-Borges M, Iraola V, Fernandez-Caldas E, Capriles-Hulett A, Caballero-Fonseca F. Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(3):714ā6.
Adachi YS, Itazawa T, Okabe Y, Higuchi O, Ito Y, Adachi Y. A case of mite-ingestion-associated exercise- induced anaphylaxis mimicking wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;162(2):181ā3.
Suesirisawad S, Malainual N, Tungtrongchitr A, Chatchatee P, Suratannon N, Ngamphaiboon J. Dust mite infestation in cooking flour: experimental observations and practical recommendations. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2015;33(2):123ā8.
Sanchez-Borges M, Fernandez-Caldas E, Capriles-Hulett A, Caballero-Fonseca F. Mite-induced inflammation: more than allergy. Allergy Rhinol. 2012;3(1):e25āe2929.
Yi FC, Chen JY, Chee KK, Chua KY, Lee BW. Dust mite infestation of flour samples. Allergy. 2009;64(12):1788ā9.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Anthony Tan provided professional writing services.
Funding
No funding has been received for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS, YS, NM, CW, AJ, OT each contributed to the laboratory analysis and interpretation of the data, and revised the manuscript for important scientific content. MS, TT contributed to the revision of the manuscript for important scientific content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Written and informed consent was obtained from the patient to participate.
Consent for publication
Written and informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient. The patient was informed that de-identified data would be used in the scientific research and publications.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Sompornrattanaphan, M., Jitvanitchakul, Y., Malainual, N. et al. Dust mite ingestion-associated, exercise-induced anaphylaxis: a case report and literature review. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 16, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-019-0399-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-019-0399-1
Keywords
- Pancake syndrome
- Oral mite anaphylaxis
- Food allergy
- House dust mite
- Exercise-induced anaphylaxis