Skip to main content

The frequencies of peripheral blood CD5+CD19+ B cells, CD3CD16+CD56+ NK, and CD3+CD56+ NKT cells and serum interleukin-10 in patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder



Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica syndrome disease (NMOSD) are inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system. The pathogenesis and treatments for these two conditions are very different. Natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells are immune cells with an important role in shaping the immune response. B cells are involved in antigen presentation as well as antibody and cytokine production. There is conflicting evidence of the roles of NK, NKT, and B cells in the two conditions. We aimed to compare the frequency of CD3CD16+CD56+NK, CD3+ CD56+ NKT, and CD5+CD19+ B cells in the peripheral blood and serum Interleukin-10 (IL-10) in patients with MS and NMOSD.


CD19+CD5+ B, CD3 CD16+CD56+ NK, and CD3+CD56+ NKT cells were quantitated by flow cytometry in 15 individuals with Interferon-Beta (IFN-β) treated relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), 15 untreated RRMS, and 15 NMOSD patients as well as 30 healthy controls (HC). Serum IL-10 was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).


The percentage of CD3CD56+CD16+ NK cells in the peripheral blood of IFN-treated MS (1.81 ± 0.87) was significantly lower than for untreated RRMS (4.74 ± 1.80), NMOSD (4.64 ± 1.26) and HC (5.83 ± 2.19) (p < 0.0001). There were also differences for the percentage of CD3CD16+ and CD3CD56+ cells (p < 0.001 and p < 0.0007; respectively). IFN-treated RRMS (2.89 ± 1.51) had the lowest proportion of CD3+CD56+ among the study groups (p < 0.002). Untreated RRMS (5.56 ± 3.04) and NMOSD (5.47 ± 1.24) had higher levels of CD3+CD56+ than the HC (3.16 ± 1.98). The mean percentage of CD19+CD5+ B cells in the peripheral blood of untreated RRMS patients (1.32 ± 0.67) was higher compared to the patients with NMOSD (0.30 ± 0.20), HC (0.5 ± 0.22) and IFN-treated RRMS (0.81 ± 0.17) (p < 0.0001). Serum interleukin-10 was significantly higher in the IFN-treated RRMS (8.06 ± 5.39) and in HC (8.38 ± 2.84) compared to untreated RRMS (5.07 ± 1.44) and the patients with NMOSD (5.33 ± 2.56) (p < 0.003).


The lower proportion of CD3CD56+ CD16+ NK and CD3+CD56+ cells in peripheral blood of IFN-treated RRMS compared to other groups suggests the importance of immunomodulation in patients with RRMS disorder. Based on the differences in CD19+CD5+ B cells and serum IL-10 between patients and HC, supplementary assessments could be of value in clarifying their roles in autoimmunity.


MS is a common neuro-inflammatory disease affecting young people globally. Of the four diagnostic types of MS, RRMS is the most prevalent accounting for 85% of MS cases. Primary progressive, secondary progressive and primary relapsing MS are other types of this disorder [1]. Specific genetic and environmental factors increase the susceptibility of individuals to MS [1]. NMOSD is another neuro-inflammatory disease [2], It is associated with similar clinical signs as MS, which include vision problems and motor disabilities. Studies have shown glycosylated lesions, nerve damage and atrophy of the spinal cord as the clinical symptoms in patients with NMOSD. As the clinical manifestations of NMOSD disease are comparable to those of MS, NMOSD has been misdiagnosed as a type of MS for many years until the identification of an anti NMO antibody known as anti-aquaporin (AQP4) in 2004 [3, 4]. NK cells play a key role in immune surveillance and defense against viral infections. NK cells possess no specific receptor and recognize their targets without sensitization, and exert their effects via cytokine release and direct cytotoxicity mediated by granzyme A and perforin [5]. There is conflicting evidence concerning the roles of NK cells in the pathogenesis and disease protection in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse model. NK cells shape immune responses and induce the polarization of different subsets of the central nervous system (CNS) infiltrating dendritic cells. However, many studies on EAE have suggested that the role of the NK cells is mediated through changes in the population of executable cells that prevent tissue damage [6, 7]. This controversy is related to the function of NK cells in the onset and progression of the disease. The two following points may explain this paradox. Firstly, NK cells play a substantial role in T helper (Th) polarization and consequently in the onset and progression of MS [8]. Secondly, different subtypes of NK cells probably have different functions in the onset and progression of EAE. Studies on RRMS patients have shown that the frequency of these cells is reduced in MS [9] and elevates following immunotherapy. These results point to the remarkable role of these immune cells in RRMS [10, 11]. However, the effects of NK cells on the immunological responses in MS have not yet been elucidated. There is evidence suggesting that NK cells may have a pathogenic role in some CNS disease. NK cells migrate to the CNS and affect immune system components. CD3+CD56+ NKT cells are innate immune cells that express different antigens including: CD3, CD56 and some chemokine receptors. They are located in the liver, bone marrow, thymus, spleen, and peripheral blood [12]. NKT cell recognize lipid antigen via MHC-I like molecule CD1d and activate dendritic cells following by innate and adoptive immune response stimulation or regulation [13]. Activated NKT cell secret different cytokines including IFN-γ, IL-2, -4, -10, -13, -17, -21, and 22, granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM–CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [14, 15]. In other means, NKT can stimulate Th1 and Th2 responses. There is some evidence for a protective role of NKT cell in MS and other autoimmune disease, however their possible role in NMOSD is unclear [16].

B lymphocytes are involved in regulating the severity of autoimmune diseases such as MS and NMOSD. B lymphocytes can be classified into subgroups 1 and 2. Conventional B cells (B2) activate and polarize T lymphocytes to Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively [17]. B-1 cells mediate various functions such as antigen presentation, cytokine release and auto antibody production [18]. There are certain functional differences between B1 and B2. B1 cells are derived from fetal liver and to a lesser extent from the bone marrow of adults, whilst B2 cells are derived mainly from the bone marrow [19, 20]. B1 cells have two principal subsets, B-1a expressing CD5 as a pan T cell marker and B-1b, which does not express CD5 marker. [21]. IL-10 is produced by different subsets of innate and adoptive immune cells including T CD4+, T CD8+ cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells, which can also impair T cell proliferation [22,23,24]. As an anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10 regulate inflammatory immune responses via inhibition MHC and co-stimulatory molecule expression, as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines production such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, and TNF-a [23, 25, 26]. There is some evidence of the stimulatory effects of IL-10 on the immune system. An increase in IL-10 levels in EAE animal model leads to Th2 and T regulatory (Treg) differentiation, which mediates inflammation in EAE animal model [27,28,29]. However, IL-10 exerts its neuro-protecting effect by preventing glutamate-induced neuronal apoptosis through restoring suppressed anti-apoptotic elements, namely Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, and reducing caspase-3 expression [30]. Despite clinical similarities between MS and NMOSD, there are critical differences concerning the pattern of pathogenesis and therapeutic protocols that are used for their treatments [34]. Due to the immunological basis of the two diseases, a great deal of research has been carried out on the distinctive components of the immune system [31]. The aim of our study was to investigate the peripheral blood frequency of the CD3CD56+CD16+NK, CD3+CD56+ NKT and CD5+CD19+ B cells and serum IL-10 in IFN-treated and untreated RRMS, NMOSD, and healthy individuals.


Blood samples

The study groups comprised: 15 RRMS (under treatment with interferon beta-1a for at least 1 year), 15 RRMS (early onset RRMS patients who were diagnosed with MS for less than 3 years, who were not receiving any immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive drugs), 15 NMOSD (on immunosuppressive treatment), and 30 HC subjects. The MS and NMOSD patients were diagnosed according to the McDonald 2010 and Wingerchuck criteria, respectively [32]. Moreover, all the individuals with NMOSD were NMO-IgG seropositive. The healthy subjects were matched in terms of age and sex. The control subjects had no history of autoimmune, inflammatory or malignant diseases. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Iran University of Medical Science and informed consent was obtained from all participants. 5 ml peripheral blood was collected from all subjects. Samples were transferred to the laboratory and fresh whole blood was utilized for flow cytometry assay. Serum was separated and stored at − 20 °C for subsequent measurement using ELISA. The serum level of IL-10 was assessed by using IL-10 high sensitivity human ELISA kit (Abcam, usable range: 1.56–50 pg/ml; and a sensitivity of 1.3 pg/ml). All methods in this study were conducted based on the ethical standards of the local ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences and also based on the 1964 Helsinki declaration, its recent amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Sample staining and flow data analysis

The following flurochrome monoclonal antibodies were purchased from BD Bioscience Company: PerCP (Peridinin Chlorophyll Protein Complex) mouse anti-human CD3 clone SP34-2, FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) mouse anti-human CD16 clone 3G8 and PE (phycoerythrin) mouse anti-human NCAM-1 (CD56) clone R19-760, PE mouse CD5 clone UCHT2 (RUO) and FITC mouse anti-human CD19 clone HIB19 (RUO). Isotype controls were also utilized (all the antibodies were purchased from BD Bioscience). FACSCalibur Flowcytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems) was used in three- and two-color staining to quantitate NK, NKT and B cells, respectively. After staining, tubes were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C in dark, followed by the addition of 1 ml lysing buffer. The tubes were incubated for 15 min in dark and samples were prepared for survey by flow cytometry. After gating on the lymphocyte population, 100,000 cells were counted on each gate. All flow data were analyzed using Flowjo 10 version.

Gating strategy

To analyze the NK cells, we first gated the lymphocyte in the whole blood population using forward and side scatters plot (Fig. 1A), then the CD3 negative population was gated to analysis different population of NK cells (Fig. 1B). Q2 with CD3CD16+CD56+ phenotype is known as NK cells. A sum of Q3 and Q2 is equal to the percentage of CD3CD16+ cells. In addition, Q1 plus Q2 cells are representative of CD3CD56+ cells. (Fig.1C). In order to analyze NKT cell, after gating lymphocyte population in forward and side scatters plot, a quadrant was drew in CD3 and CD56 dot plots and dual population of CD3+CD56+ (Q2) was considered as CD3+CD56+ NKT cells (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow cytometry analysis of NK cells. A Whole blood pattern, Lymphocyte gating. B We gated CD3 negative population for NK cells analysis. C As shown, there are different populations: CD3 CD56+ (Q1), CD3 CD16+ CD56+ (Q2), and CD3 CD16+(Q3) NK cells. D After lymphocyte gate, we drew a dot plot of CD3+ CD56+ cells, which represent the NKT cells. This is a data of HC subject

For B cells analysis, following lymphocyte gating (Fig. 2A), a dot plot of CD5 and CD19 parameters was drew and dual CD19+CD5+ population (Q2) was considered as CD5+CD19+ B1 cells (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow cytometry analysis of B1 cells. A Whole blood pattern, Lymphocyte gating. B A quadrant was drew and double population of CD5 CD19 as Q6 are shown This data represents HC

Statistical analysis

The normality in the distribution of data, was assessed by Shapiro–Wilk test. A one-way ANOVA test was then employed and a P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Data are showed as mean ± SD. All analyses were conducted by Graphpad Prism.


Comparison of NK and NKT cells among the groups

CD3-CD16+CD56+, CD3CD16+, CD3CD56+, CD3+CD56+ expression was assessed in the peripheral blood of IFN-treated RRMS [15], untreated RRMS [15], NMOSD [15] and healthy [30] subjects using a FACS Calibur flow cytometer, as shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows age and sex distribution among the groups. No significant differences in patients Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score were observed (Table 2). Based on Tables 1 as well as Fig. 3C, there was a lower percentage of CD3CD56+CD16+ cells in IFN-treated RRMS (1.81 ± 0.87) compared to untreated RRMS (4.74 ± 1.80), NMOSD (4.64 ± 1.26) and HC (5.83 ± 2.19) groups (p < 0.0001). CD3CD56+CD16+ percentage was significantly lower in NMOSD than HC groups (p < 0.047). Similarly, CD3CD16+ and CD3CD56+ proportion was in the lowest level in IFN-treated RRMS (3.13 ± 1.49, 4.73 ± 2.63; respectively) compared to other groups (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0007, respectively; Fig. 3A and B). As shown in Table 1, the percentage of CD3+CD56+ cells were significantly higher in number in the untreated RRMS (5.56 ± 3.04) and NMOSD (5.47 ± 1.24) compared to the IFN-treated RRMS (2.89 ± 1.51) groups (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001; respectively) (Table 1, Fig. 3D). There was a significant difference in CD3+CD56+ between untreated RRMS and HC (p < 0.05) as well as between NMSOD and HC (3.16 ± 1.98) (p < 0.01) (Table 1, Fig. 3D).

Table 1 CD3 CD16+, CD3 CD56+, CD3 CD16+ CD56+ NK cells, CD3+ CD56+ NKT cells, and CD5+ CD19+ B cells percentage, IL-10 serum levels in IFN-treated RRMS, IFN-treated MS, NMOSD and HC groups
Table 2 Clinic-demographic data. EDSS and age values indicate mean \(\pm\) SD
Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison the mean percentage of A CD16, B CD56, and C CD56+CD16+, NK Cells among the groups \(\pm\) SD

Comparison of CD5+CD19+ B cell and IL-10 among the groups

The frequency of CD19+CD5+ B cells was significantly different among the groups (Table1, p < 0.05). The lowest percentage of CD19+CD5+ B cells was observed in the patients with NMOSD (0.30 ± 0.20). Untreated RRMS (1.32 ± 0.67) and IFN-treated RRMS (0.81 ± 0.17) group showed a higher frequency in CD19+CD5+ B cells compared to the HC (0.5 ± 0.22) group (Fig. 4A). IL-10 serum levels were also significantly different among the groups (Table 1, Fig. 4B; p < 0.003), the lowest IL-10 levels was observed in untreated RRMS (5.07 ± 1.44 pg/ml) individuals, while IL-10 levels of IFN-treated RRMS and HC were at higher frequencies (8.06 ± 5.39 pg/ml and 8.38 ± 2.84 pg/ml, respectively). A significant difference was observed between HC and NMOSD (5.33 ± 2.56) (p < 0.01) as well as untrated RRMS (p < 0.05). No significant correlation was observed betweeen measured paramteres.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison the mean percentage of A CD5+CD19+ cell, B IL-10 serum level among the groups \(\pm\) SD


NK cells play a vital role in immune defence against micro-organisms and the regulation of immunological responses against tumors. NK cells have been noted for their involvement in immunological aspects of multiple sclerosis. There are several reports about the effect of NK and NKT cells in neuroimmunological aspect of multiple sclerosis disorder. The controversial reports of NK cells motivated us to study them in two autoimmune diseases in different groups as well as healthy subjects [33, 34]. In the present study, the minimum and maximum percentage of CD3CD16+, CD3CD56+, and CD3CD16+CD56+ was observed in IFN-treated RRMS and HC, respectively. The present results are similar to previous reports that have reported the importance of interferon beta therapy in MS patients to reduce CD3CD56+ NK cell in the peripheral blood [35, 36]. A signifiant decrease in CD3CD16+CD56+ NK cell in NMOSD compared to HC group (p < 0.05, Table 1, Fig. 3C) was observed in our study. Nevertheles, Tahrali et al. in the investigation of surface markers and intracellular cytokine of NK cells stated that the level of inflammatory responses of NK cell is significantly higher in RRMS treated compared to untreated RRMS patients. They included IFN and glatiramer acetate (GA) in treated RRMS patients, whereas we studied purticularly IFN-treated RRMS patients [37]. A previous study reported that GA leads to rise in NK cell activities by increasing cytotoxicity receptors such as NKp30, NKp44, NKp46 and NKG2D. The discrepency identified above may be largly bacause of the treatment used [38]. Ding et al. recently published that the frequency of NK cell in remission and acute phase of NMOSD is significantly lower than acute phase MS patients [39]. Although no significant differences were observed between NMOSD and untreated RRMS patients in the present study, which may be due to the different number of patients and not dividing the NMOSD group into subjects with acute disease or in remission. According to Mandal et al. NK cell proportion is higher in the onset of disease, when it is hard to evaluate these cells [40]. An animal study using the EAE model revealed the severity of disease could be ameliorated by NK cell depletion [6, 41, 42], which highlight the protective role of NK cells. These kinds of discerepencies emphasize on the great imortance of clarifing the distinct phenotype of NK cell in different phase of disease.

Moreover, our results showed no significant difference in CD3CD16+CD56+ between untreated RRMS and HC groups, which is consistent with the study of Laroni et al.; in which they reported that the regulatory function of these cells is diminished [43].

The proportion of CD3+CD56+ cell in peripheral blood of untreated RRMS patients was higher than HC and IFN-treated RRMS (both p < 0.05). Interestingly, this population was more frequent in NMOSD compared to IFN-treated RRMS and HC (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01; respectively). This decline in NKT cell proportion in IFN-treated RRMS is confirmed by previous studies [44, 45]. However, O'Keeffe et al. reported NKT cell frequency was higher in RRMS than in HC [46]. CD1d-deficient EAE mice showed more severe symptom of disease, the protective role of NKT in EAE model is maybe due to inhibiting Th1 responses by Th2 cytokine profile [47]. There is no direct evidence about CD3+CD56+ cells in NMOSD.

B cells are generally involved in shaping specific immune responses such as plasma cell differentiation, auto antibody and cytokine production [48]. They act as antigen presenting cells to stimulate T cell responses. These mechanisms may contribute to MS disease pathogenesis [49]. EAE animal studies have verified the pathogenicities of B cells by means of their differentiating into plasma cells and auto antibody production [50]. CD5+ B-1 cells are long-living and self-renewing subsets of B cells with high capability in poly reactive auto-antibody production and apoptotic bodies clearance. Since autoantibodies are secreted by B-1 cells, they are regarded as potential contributors to several autoimmune diseases, such as MS, Sjogren’s syndrome, SLE and rheumatoid arthritis [51]. CD5 is one of the critical marker of B1 cells, which is involved in regulating several immune cells. We conducted an investigation on peripheral blood levels of CD19+CD5+ B1 cells in IFN-treated and untreated RRMS, NMOSD and HC groups for the first time and a significant difference between groups was demonstrated. Untreated RRMS subjects had the highest share of B1 cells (p < 0.0001). This was the first time that the frequency of CD19+CD5+ cells was investigated in NMOSD patients, and according to the results, it was significantly lower than for healthy subjects (Fig. 4A, Table 1). The lower levels of B1 cells were validated in a study by Rovituso et al., in which the peripheral blood levels of CD20+CD27+CD43+CD70 B1 cells were lower in MS patients in contrast to HC. These results may shed further light on the important role of B-1 cells in MS and NMOSD [52]. There are some supporting evidence about the involvement of B-1 cells in MS, as Torring et al. reported the elevated frequency of B1 cells in the remiting phase of MS condition [53]. It is reported that the frequency of B1 cells are elevated in autoimmune disorders in human and mouse model and genetic depletion of this cell population in mouse models led to ameliorate autoimmunity [17, 54]. Due to the paucity of studies, drawing a precise conclusion about the disparity of B1 cell in neuro autoimmune diseases, particulary NMOSD needs furthur studies. However, it seems that B1 cells may contribute to the immunomodulatory status of the immune system, which favors better recovery from MS autoimmunity. Apparently, more inquiries would provide supplementary details on B1 cell functions. Pre-naive mature B cells, that express CD5 marker, play their role in humoral immunity via their differentiation into plasma cells and antibody production [55]. Mature B cells also are involved in T cell immunity formation by presenting antigen, supplying them stimulation and cytokines, and activating them to develop effector and memory T cells [56]. Moreover, B cells can affect immune responses by inhibiting TCD4+ cells formation and Treg induction to secrete IL-10 [57]. CD5 marker of B1 cells is contributor to IL-10 production through a non-selective calcium ion channel named transient receptor potential channel 1. Upon this Ca2+ dependent pathway, mitogen-activated protein kinase is activated, which leads to phosphorylation of extracellularly-regulated kinase-1 and -2 Erk1/2 and IL-10 procuction [58]. Moreover, IL-10 is highly engaged in inhibition of auto-reactive B1 cells via a negative feedback [54, 59]. Various subsets of leukocytes are invovled in IL-10 production including Th1, Treg, TCD8+, B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils and eosinophils [60]. IL-10 manage immunusupressive effects via blocking the process of immunce response foramation for instance B7/CD28 costimulatory pathway and DC maturation, which results in decreasing the MHC class II expression [61]. IL-10 has controversial effects on different autoimmune diseases (SLE vs. MS). B-1 cells can exacerbate several disorders such as SLE, due to the production of cytokines and natural autoantibodies as well as their antigen presenting capabilities [62]. To evaluate the balance between Th1 and Th2 responses, we selected IL-10 as a surrogate of Th2 immunity. Lower levels of serum IL-10 were observed in MS and NMOSD patients compared to HC (p < 0.05). Intrestingly, it was demonstrated that the serum levels of IL-10 were higher in IFN-treated RRMS compared to untreated RRMS patients (Fig. 4B). This possibly suggests the regulatory function of IL-10 in MS disease. Furthermore, there is a less severe inflammatory response in the remission phase of MS compared to the relapsing phase. Previous investigation has been elucidated that IL-10 serum level would decrease before relapse and increase in remission phase of MS [63]. In the other word, regarding to a prior study the IL-10 levels decline during relapse and elevate through remission, demonstrating the necessity of IL-10 during the remission phase [64]. This could confirm a shift from Th responses toward Th2 dominance after MS first line therapy, which was administered in naive MS patients, who did not receive any immunomodulatory drugs. Interestingly, Wei et al. reported clinically isolated syndrome patients with lower IL-10 level were more predicted to develop secondary relapse [65]. However, Kallaur et al. stated no significant difference in IL-10 levels between MS and HC groups [66]. It is suggested to consider more cytokines especially intracellular as well as regulatory and activatory markers in the future studies. To explain in detail, it is highly recommended to investigate some regulatory markers including FoxP3 in CD5+ B cells along as intracellular level of lL-10. Adding more markers would clarify their functions in more features. It is also applies to NK cells. Investigating the different subsets of NK and B1 cells, including more inflammatory and non-inflammatory cytokines, and their possible roles in neuro-autoimmune conditions would elucidate more detailed information about their possible correlation with disease severity.


The lower proportion of CD3CD56+CD16+ NK and CD3+CD56+ cells in the peripheral blood of IFN-treated patients with RRMS compared to other groups suggests the importance of immunomodulation in patients with RRMS disorder. Based on the differences in CD19+CD5+ B cells and serum IL-10 between patients and HC, supplementary assessments could be of value in clarifying their roles in autoimmunity. This approach could be productive in treatment prediction and development of novel therapies.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.



Multiple sclerosis


Neuromyelitis optica syndrome disease


Expanded disability status scale


Central nervous system


Natural killer cells


Healthy controls




T Helper


T regulatory


Interferon gamma

TNF- α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha


Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor




Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay




  1. 1.

    Ozakbas S, Cinar BP, Kahraman T. The 20-year history: change of multiple sclerosis patient profile over 20 years. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;33:1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bukhari W, Barnett MH, Prain K, Broadley SA. Molecular pathogenesis of neuromyelitis optica. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(10):12970–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marrie RA, Gryba C. The Incidence and prevalence of neuromyelitis optica: a systematic review. Int J MS Care. 2013;15(3):113–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dargahi N, Katsara M, Tselios T, Androutsou M-E, de Courten M, Matsoukas J, et al. Multiple sclerosis: immunopathology and treatment update. Brain Sci. 2017;7(7):78.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chanvillard C, Jacolik RF, Infante-Duarte C, Nayak RC. The role of natural killer cells in multiple sclerosis and their therapeutic implications. Front Immunol. 2013;4:63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhang B-n, Yamamura T, Kondo T, Fujiwara M, Tabira T. Regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by natural killer (NK) cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186(10):1677–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lu L, Ikizawa K, Hu D, Werneck MB, Wucherpfennig KW, Cantor H. Regulation of activated CD4+ T cells by NK cells via the Qa-1–NKG2A inhibitory pathway. Immunity. 2007;26(5):593–604.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Flodström M, Shi FD, Sarvetnick N, Ljunggren HG. The natural killer cell—friend or foe in autoimmune disease? Scand J Immunol. 2002;55(5):432–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    De Jager PL, Rossin E, Pyne S, Tamayo P, Ottoboni L, Viglietta V, et al. Cytometric profiling in multiple sclerosis uncovers patient population structure and a reduction of CD8low cells. Brain. 2008;131(7):1701–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Saraste M, Irjala H, Airas L. Expansion of CD56Bright natural killer cells in the peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta. Neurol Sci. 2007;28(3):121–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Beilekova B. Regulatory CD56(bright) natural killer cells mediate immunomodulatory effects of IL2Rα-targeted therapy (daclizumab) in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:5941–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Laloux V, Beaudoin L, Ronet C, Lehuen A. Phenotypic and functional differences between NKT cells colonizing splanchnic and peripheral lymph nodes. J Immunol. 2002;168(7):3251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robertson FC, Berzofsky JA, Terabe M. NKT cell networks in the regulation of tumor immunity. Front Immunol. 2014;5:543.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Terabe M, Berzofsky JA. The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity. Adv Cancer Res. 2008;101:277–348.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Parekh VV, Wu L, Olivares-Villagómez D, Wilson KT, Van Kaer L. Activated invariant NKT cells control central nervous system autoimmunity in a mechanism that involves myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunol. 2013;190(5):1948–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Franitza S, Grabovsky V, Wald O, Weiss I, Beider K, Dagan M, et al. Differential usage of VLA-4 and CXCR4 by CD3+ CD56+ NKT cells and CD56+ CD16+ NK cells regulates their interaction with endothelial cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(5):1333–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Duan B, Morel L. Role of B-1a cells in autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2006;5(6):403–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wanleenuwat P, Iwanowski P. Role of B cells and antibodies in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;36: 101416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kantor AB, Herzenberg LA. Origin of murine B cell lineages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11(1):501–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hardy RR, Hayakawa K. CD5 B cells, a fetal B cell lineage. In: Dixon FJ, editor. Advances in immunology, vol. 55. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1993. p. 297–339.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hippen KL, Tze LE, Behrens TW. CD5 maintains tolerance in anergic B cells. J Exp Med. 2000;191(5):883–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fiorentino DF, Bond MW, Mosmann T. Two types of mouse T helper cell. IV. Th2 clones secrete a factor that inhibits cytokine production by Th1 clones. J Exp Med. 1989;170(6):2081–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Moore KW, de Waal MR, Coffman RL, O’Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19(1):683–765.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kamanaka M, Kim ST, Wan YY, Sutterwala FS, Lara-Tejero M, Galán JE, et al. Expression of interleukin-10 in intestinal lymphocytes detected by an interleukin-10 reporter knockin tiger mouse. Immunity. 2006;25(6):941–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Schandené L, Alonso-Vega C, Willems F, Gerard C, Delvaux A, Velu T, et al. B7/CD28-dependent IL-5 production by human resting T cells is inhibited by IL-10. J Immunol. 1994;152(9):4368–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Joss A, Akdis M, Faith A, Blaser K, Akdis CA. IL-10 directly acts on T cells by specifically altering the CD28 co-stimulation pathway. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30(6):1683–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hedrich CM, Bream JH. Cell type-specific regulation of IL-10 expression in inflammation and disease. Immunol Res. 2010;47(1–3):185–206.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ray A, Wang L, Dittel BN. IL-10-independent regulatory B-cell subsets and mechanisms of action. Int Immunol. 2015;27(10):531–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Aghaie T, Jazayeri MH, Avan A, Anissian A, Salari AA. Gold nanoparticles and polyethylene glycol alleviate clinical symptoms and alter cytokine secretion in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. IUBMB Life. 2019;71(9):1313–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhou Z, Peng X, Insolera R, Fink DJ, Mata M. Interleukin-10 provides direct trophic support to neurons. J Neurochem. 2009;110(5):1617–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hao J, Liu R, Piao W, Zhou Q, Vollmer TL, Campagnolo DI, et al. Central nervous system (CNS)-resident natural killer cells suppress Th17 responses and CNS autoimmune pathology. J Exp Med. 2010;207(9):1907–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Morse RH, Seguin R, McCrea EL, Antel JP. NK cell-mediated lysis of autologous human oligodendrocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;116(1):107–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang H, Bennett JL, Verkman AS. Ex vivo spinal cord slice model of neuromyelitis optica reveals novel immunopathogenic mechanisms. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(6):943–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Li Z, Lim WK, Mahesh SP, Liu B, Nussenblatt RB. Cutting edge: in vivo blockade of human IL-2 receptor induces expansion of CD56bright regulatory NK cells in patients with active uveitis. J Immunol. 2005;174(9):5187–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Perini P, Wadhwa M, Buttarello M, Meager A, Facchinetti A, Thorpe R, et al. Effect of IFNβ and anti-IFNβ antibodies on NK cells in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2000;105(1):91–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tahrali I, Kucuksezer UC, Akdeniz N, Altintas A, Uygunoglu U, Aktas-Cetin E, et al. CD3-CD56+ NK cells display an inflammatory profile in RR-MS patients. Immunol Lett. 2019;216:63–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Høglund RA, Holmøy T, Harbo HF, Maghazachi AA. A one year follow-up study of natural killer and dendritic cells activities in multiple sclerosis patients receiving glatiramer acetate (GA). PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4): e62237.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ding J, Zhu D-S, Hong R-H, Wu Y-F, Li Z-Z, Zhou X-J, et al. The differential expression of natural killer cells in NMOSD and MS. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;71:9–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mandal A, Viswanathan C. Natural killer cells: in health and disease. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2015;8(2):47–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Xu W, Fazekas G, Hara H, Tabira T. Mechanism of natural killer (NK) cell regulatory role in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2005;163(1–2):24–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hao J, Liu R, Piao W, Zhou Q, Vollmer TL, Campagnolo DI, et al. Central nervous system (CNS)–resident natural killer cells suppress Th17 responses and CNS autoimmune pathology. J Exp Med. 2010;207(9):1907–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Laroni A, Armentani E, de Rosbo NK, Ivaldi F, Marcenaro E, Sivori S, et al. Dysregulation of regulatory CD56bright NK cells/T cells interactions in multiple sclerosis. J Autoimmun. 2016;72:8–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    O’Keeffe J, Podbielska M, Hogan EL. Invariant natural killer T cells and their ligands: focus on multiple sclerosis. Immunology. 2015;145(4):468–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gausling R, Trollmo C, Hafler DA. Decreases in interleukin-4 secretion by invariant CD4− CD8− Vα24JαQ T cells in peripheral blood of patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunol. 2001;98(1):11–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    O’Keeffe J, Gately CM, Counihan T, Hennessy M, Leahy T, Moran AP, et al. T-cells expressing natural killer (NK) receptors are altered in multiple sclerosis and responses to α-galactosylceramide are impaired. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275(1–2):22–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Teige A, Teige I, Lavasani S, Bockermann R, Mondoc E, Holmdahl R, et al. CD1-dependent regulation of chronic central nervous system inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2004;172(1):186–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Molina RD, Conzatti LP, da Silva APB, Goi LDS, da Costa BK, Machado DC, et al. Detection of autoantibodies in central nervous system inflammatory disorders: clinical application of cell-based assays. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;38: 101858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lehmann-Horn K, Kronsbein HC, Weber MS. Targeting B cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: recent advances and remaining challenges. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6(3):161–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Merkler D, Schmelting B, Czeh B, Fuchs E, Stadelmann C, Brück W. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in the common marmoset reflects the immunopathology of pattern II multiple sclerosis lesions. Mult Scler J. 2006;12(4):369–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lee J, Kuchen S, Fischer R, Chang S, Lipsky PE. Identification and characterization of a human CD5+ pre-naive B cell population. J Immunol. 2009;182(7):4116–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rovituso D, Heller S, Schroeter M, Kleinschnitz C, Kuerten S. B1 cells are unaffected by immune modulatory treatment in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;272(1–2):86–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Torring C, Petersen CC, Bjerg L, Kofod-Olsen E, Petersen T, Hollsberg P. The B1-cell subpopulation is diminished in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2013;262(1–2):92–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sindhava V, Bondada S. Multiple Regulatory Mechanisms Control B-1 B Cell Activation. Front Immunol. 2012;3: 372.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Jazayeri MH, Pourfathollah AA, Rasaee MJ, Porpak Z, Jafari ME. The concentration of total serum IgG and IgM in sera of healthy individuals varies at different age intervals. Biomed Aging Pathol. 2013;3:241–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    LeBien TW, Tedder TF. B lymphocytes: how they develop and function. Blood. 2008;112(5):1570–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    DiLillo DJ, Matsushita T, Tedder TF. B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1183(1):38–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Garaud S, Taher TE, Debant M, Burgos M, Melayah S, Berthou C, et al. CD5 expression promotes IL-10 production through activation of the MAPK/Erk pathway and upregulation of TRPC1 channels in B lymphocytes. Cell Mol Immunol. 2018;15(2):158–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    O’Garra A, Chang R, Go N, Hastings R, Haughton G, Howard M. Ly-1 B (B-1) cells are the main source of B cell-derived interleukin 10. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22(3):711–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lobo-Silva D, Carriche GM, Castro AG, Roque S, Saraiva M. Balancing the immune response in the brain: IL-10 and its regulation. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Taylor A, Verhagen J, Blaser K, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of immune suppression by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor-β: the role of T regulatory cells. Immunology. 2006;117(4):433–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Chen LC, Delgado JC, Jensen PE, Chen X. Direct expansion of human allospecific FoxP3<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup> regulatory T cells with allogeneic B cells for therapeutic application. J Immunol. 2009;183(6):4094–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kwilasz A, Grace P, Serbedzija P, Maier S, Watkins L. The therapeutic potential of interleukin-10 in neuroimmune diseases. Neuropharmacology. 2015;96:55–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Waubant E, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Sloan R, Cotleur A, Rudick R, et al. Relationship between serum levels of IL-10, MRI activity and interferon beta-1a therapy in patients with relapsing remitting MS. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;112(1–2):139–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wei Y, Chang H, Feng H, Li X, Zhang X, Yin L. Low serum interleukin-10 is an independent predictive factor for the risk of second event in clinically isolated syndromes. Front Neurol. 2019;10: 604.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kallaur AP, Oliveira SR, de Almeida ERD, Morimoto HK, Lopes J, de Carvalho Jennings Pereira WL, et al. Cytokine profile in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients and the association between progression and activity of the disease. Mol Med Rep. 2013;7(3):1010–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This research was financially supported by a research grant from Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Author information




MHJ and LK conceived and designed the study; MHJ and MB performed the Flow cytometery and analyzed the data; SMN performed blood sampling and clinical counseling; MHJ and RN interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript; MHJ performed statistical analyses. GAF revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mir Hadi Jazayeri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures and methods in this study were conducted based on the ethical standards of the local ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences and also based on the 1964 Helsinki declaration, its recent amendments, or comparable ethical standards (Grant No.: IR.IUMS.REC.1395.28277). We acknowledge that informed consent has been obtained in writing from all participants and that the Ethics Committee has approved the procedure.

Consent for publication

All authors are aware of and agree to the content of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khani, L., Jazayeri, M.H., Nedaeinia, R. et al. The frequencies of peripheral blood CD5+CD19+ B cells, CD3CD16+CD56+ NK, and CD3+CD56+ NKT cells and serum interleukin-10 in patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 18, 5 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • B cells
  • IL-10
  • MS
  • NK cells