Skip to main content

Attenuated androgen discontinuation in patients with hereditary angioedema: a commented case series

Abstract

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by potentially severe and life-threatening attacks of localized swelling. Prophylactic therapies are available, including attenuated androgens. Efficacy of attenuated androgens has not been assessed in large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and can be associated with frequent, and sometimes severe, side effects. As better tolerated targeted therapies become available, attenuated androgen withdrawal is increasingly considered by physicians and their patients with HAE. Attenuated androgens withdrawal has not been systematically studied in HAE, although examination of other disorders indicates that attenuated androgen withdrawal may result in mood disturbances and flu-like symptoms. Standardized protocols for attenuated androgen discontinuation that continue to provide control of attacks while limiting potential attenuated androgen withdrawal symptoms are not established as the outcomes of different withdrawal strategies have not been compared. We aim to describe the challenges of attenuated androgen discontinuation in patients with HAE and how these may continue into the post-androgen period.

Case presentation

We present a retrospective case series of 10 patients with confirmed type I HAE who have discontinued prophylactic treatment with attenuated androgens. The most common reason for attenuated androgen discontinuation was side effects. Attenuated androgens were either immediately withdrawn, tapered and/or overlapped with another treatment. The major challenge of discontinuation was the management of an increased frequency and severity of HAE attacks in some patients.

Conclusions

Healthcare teams need to undertake careful planning and monitoring after attenuated androgens discontinuation, and modify treatment strategies if HAE control is destabilized with an increased number of attacks. Discontinuation of attenuated androgens is definitively an option in an evolving HAE treatment landscape, and outcomes can be favourable with additional patient support and education.

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an inherited disorder characterized by unpredictable attacks of localized swelling in the skin and/or mucosa [1, 2]. HAE is most frequently caused by mutations in SERPING1, resulting in reduced production (type I HAE) or dysfunction (type II HAE) of the C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) protein. This leads to vasodilation, increased capillary permeability and swelling, mediated by bradykinin (which is generated by the contact activation system) [1, 3,4,5]. HAE attacks are recurrent and frequently affect the face, extremities, upper airway and abdomen [2, 4]. Even mild attacks may cause transient discomfort and disfigurement, whereas abdominal attacks can be so painful that they may mimic an acute abdomen (leading to inappropriate surgery), and swelling of the larynx can be fatal [1, 2]. Because of the unpredictability and potential severity of HAE attacks, it is recommended that all patients are evaluated for the need for long-term prophylactic treatments [6]. Several prophylactic therapies are available (Table 1), which either replace deficient C1-INH or inhibit kallikrein – a component of the contact system that catalyses the production of bradykinin. An additional and historical option to targeted therapies for long-term prophylaxis is attenuated androgen (AA) treatment. AAs, such as danazol, stanozolol and oxandrolone, have not been studied in large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, and available data are from limited numbers of patients [11, 19,20,21]. Treatment effects can be highly variable, and although some studies support the efficacy of androgens [11, 19], others show suboptimal outcomes [22, 23]. AAs are associated with side effects in approximately 80% of patients in some studies [6, 19, 20, 24]. As outlined in Table 1, these side effects may take a variety of forms including, but not limited to, weight gain, hypertension, proatherogenic lipid profile changes, headaches, cramps, mood disturbances (such as depression and anxiety), acne, and polycythaemia [11, 21, 24,25,26,27]. Although the safety profiles of AAs are derived from studies in small numbers of patients, with the potential for the majority of treated patients to be affected, the use of AAs and patient monitoring must be carefully evaluated. Further, AAs may not be appropriate in female patients because of potential virilisation and menstrual irregularities, and are contraindicated during pregnancy because of possible virilisation of female fetuses [6, 21, 24,25,26, 28]. In children and adolescents, AA use is not appropriate because of potential effects on bone development [6, 29], and the potential risk of early puberty [30, 31]. AAs are contraindicated in several conditions such as cardiovascular diseases or cancer, and also with a large number of drugs [18]. As effective and better tolerated targeted options for long-term prophylaxis are approved or developed [32,33,34,35,36,37], the use of AAs is decreasing and AA discontinuation is becoming an increasingly used option or necessity because of side effects, contraindications and/or patient/physician preference. Although other treatment options may be preferred to androgens, the higher cost of the former may be a hurdle to their use in some countries and regions [36]. However, a US study in 2015 indicated that the proportion of physicians who specified a preference for long-term prophylaxis with danazol decreased from 56 to 23% between 2010 and 2013 [38, 39].

Table 1 Prophylactic treatments for HAE

AA discontinuation can result in destabilization of control of HAE attacks on one side, and a withdrawal syndrome on the other, with mood disturbances, anxiety, depression, insomnia, fatigue, hypersomnia and a flu-like syndrome, although some of these symptoms have only been studied in populations receiving high doses of androgens [40,41,42,43,44,45]. Studies of AA withdrawal in HAE have not been extensively conducted. A survey of 12 physicians treating HAE has shown that physicians had patients who had experienced complications and/or side effects of AA discontinuation including fatigue and mood disturbances [45]. Surveyed physicians were also concerned with the potential for changes to attack rates. While potential strategies for AA withdrawal in HAE—tapering, overlapping with other therapies prior to tapering or stopping, and immediate switching—were suggested based on this physician survey and the broader literature on the use of endocrine treatments [45], these strategies have not yet been systematically compared in terms of patient outcomes and further work is needed to understand the impact of different strategies. Through this case series, we describe AA discontinuation in patients with HAE caused by C1-INH deficiency. We examine the challenges associated with AA discontinuation, present patient outcomes, and describe how treatment strategies need to be modified following AA discontinuation in order to further understanding of this topic.

Case series

Methods

An advisory board of leading European experts in HAE was convened to discuss AA discontinuation in patients with HAE, a topic of current interest because of the expanding landscape of targeted prophylactics for HAE. The experts agreed that a case series could highlight challenges of AA discontinuation to healthcare professionals who treat HAE, and raise considerations for how to manage the transition to alternative treatments. This review is a retrospective case series of patients with confirmed type I HAE who have discontinued or attempted to discontinue prophylactic treatment with AAs. Descriptive statistics only are provided. Written informed consent for publication has been provided by all patients, except for one patient who was deceased and for whom consent has been provided by next of kin. All patient data are anonymized, and direct identifiers are not included [46].

Patient characteristics

The cases of 10 patients with confirmed type I HAE who either discontinued or are discontinuing AAs are presented. More comprehensive case details are provided as an Additional file 1. Three patients were female; the age range was between 31 and 76 years (median = 51 years). Patient characteristics and details of AA doses are shown in Table 2. The most commonly used AA was danazol (n = 8). Prior to AA discontinuation, all patients underwent AA dose modifications or a change of AA type (Table 2 and supplementary information). Time on AAs prior to discontinuation ranged from 1.5 to 36 years (median = 16.5 years).

Table 2 Patient characteristics, AA treatment, reasons for discontinuation and discontinuation strategy

Reasons for AA discontinuation and methods of AA discontinuation

The most common reason for AA discontinuation was the occurrence of side effects (n = 5; Table 2). Side effects included headaches, hypertension and weight gain, among others. Insufficient control of HAE attacks affected the decision to discontinue AAs in 3 patients, and 1 patient was assessed as no longer requiring prophylaxis. Contraindications were responsible for discontinuation in a further 2 patients, while an unplanned pregnancy, participation in a clinical trial and loss of access to medication were other reasons for treatment switches (2 patients experienced side effects and insufficient control of HAE attacks; 1 patient experienced side effects and had no ongoing need for prophylaxis). In 7 patients, AAs were discontinued immediately with no gradual dose reductions. Of the remaining 3 patients, 2 decreased danazol gradually while a targeted therapy (lanadelumab or pdC1-INH) was introduced and 1 discontinued gradually.

Control of HAE attacks after AA discontinuation

Outcomes of AA discontinuation are summarized in Fig. 1 and described for individual cases in Table 3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Initial treatments after attenuated androgen discontinuation, and patient outcomes. Patients were provided with a range of treatments, including prophylactic and on-demand options. In several patients, HAE attacks were not adequately controlled and further treatments were introduced. *On-demand; prophylaxis; IV, intravenous.

Table 3 Outcomes of discontinuation

Side effects of AA discontinuation

Seven patients had no side effects of discontinuation other than changes to HAE attack frequency and/or severity. Three patients experienced the following: anxiety and depression (likely due to developing cancer as well as changes to attack frequency; n = 1), weight gain (n = 1) and fatigue (n = 1).

Patient outcomes after AA discontinuation

Of the 7 patients who remained off AA treatment, time since discontinuation ranged from 7 to 84 months (median = 48 months); the majority of patients went on to receive a different form of prophylaxis (n = 6), while 1 patient received only on-demand therapy. At data collection, these patients were experiencing no or very few HAE attacks, and quality of life (QoL) had largely improved. Of the 3 patients who restarted AAs, HAE attacks continued for 2 patients whose QoL was either moderately affected or described as ‘poor’. The third patient who reintroduced AAs has experienced no attacks, but remains anxious about introducing injectable treatments.

Discussion and conclusions

Although AAs have been the historical option for long-term prophylaxis for HAE [6], there is now a shift away from these drugs [38, 39], which may continue as further targeted therapies are developed and approved, such as IV or SC pdC1-INH, lanadelumab and berotralstat [32,33,34,35, 37, 47, 48]. Our case series illustrates the heterogeneity of AA discontinuation strategies and the risk of increased HAE attack frequency and severity, alongside the potential positive outcomes for patients with HAE caused by C1-INH deficiency if appropriate management is instigated after AA withdrawal.

The most appropriate protocols for managing discontinuation of long-term AA prophylaxis have not yet been identified [40,41,42,43]; while tapering, overlapping and immediate withdrawal strategies have been suggested, these have not been systematically compared in terms of patient outcomes [45]. It is likely that a whole range of factors beyond attack control, such as patient requirements/preferences and the availability of other options, will play a role in finalizing discontinuation strategies.

The most common challenge when patients discontinued AAs was an increase in HAE attack frequency and/or severity; a challenge previously highlighted by the survey of physicians treating HAE [45]. It is important for patients and clinicians to be aware of the risk of increased attack frequency and severity, and prior to discontinuing androgens, patients should be made aware of the potential need to manage severe breakthrough attacks, and should have both access to therapies and confidence in administering these therapies promptly. HAE attack frequency and severity should be monitored closely, using either the Angioedema Activity Score [49], or patient reports or diaries, to ensure that the provided therapies continue to manage attacks. Disease registries can be particularly useful in the monitoring of disease evolution, especially if patients can autonomously enter their data in real time. Patients may require training or retraining in administering therapies because, in some cases, patients may be switching from oral AAs to injectable therapies or patients may not have had to manage a breakthrough attack for several years. Patient training must be clearly communicated, with continued support to ensure that care plans align with any changes in HAE attack frequency or severity, and patient needs [6]. Healthcare professionals should be ready to modify the treatment strategy at any stage if HAE attacks are not controlled, and follow-up appointments can be systematically included in treatment plans to ensure that any changes in attacks are communicated promptly.

Beyond the physical risk of HAE attacks, fatigue, anxiety and depression have been reported in patients with HAE discontinuing AAs [45]. Although AA discontinuation in patients with HAE has not been systematically studied, in our case series 7/10 patients reported no side effects other than changes to HAE attack frequency or severity.

The post-AA period can also herald a psychological burden, particularly in patients experiencing minimal HAE attacks while being treated with AAs, and patients require additional support to manage these anxieties. For some patients, attachment to oral AAs can be high, even in the presence of side effects, and these patients emphasize the need for education and support during and after discontinuation. One patient in our case series reintroduced AAs due to anxieties over the use of injectable on-demand and prophylactic therapies and a psychological attachment to the AAs that had controlled his attacks for 36 years. The reasons for patients not completing discontinuation or returning to AAs are also highly dependent on available resources and therapy types. As exemplified by another of the cases here, the return to AA treatment after a severe laryngeal attack can be based on limited availability of other options.

Although our case series was limited by size, the seven patients who discontinued AAs and resumed treatment with a different option experienced improvements in HAE attack control. One patient who continued treatment with on-demand therapy only has experienced only one HAE attack in a 7-year period. This emphasizes the need to regularly assess patients for prophylactic requirements. Although the management of HAE attacks is crucial, the potential impact of continuous treatment must also be considered.

In our study of real-world cases, the limited numbers of patients combined with heterogeneity of clinical circumstances and variable long-term AA regimens do not permit us to draw firm conclusions on the most appropriate strategies for AA withdrawal. It is clear that patients must be monitored closely for increases in HAE attack frequency and severity, but with careful planning and monitoring, and appropriate resources and support, discontinuation can be well managed. While approaches to AA discontinuation in HAE have been suggested [45], to develop the required understanding of and provide standardized guidance for AA discontinuation in HAE, systematic studies in higher numbers of patients are required.

Such studies should be extensive and involve national or international networks of HAE experts, such as the global network of Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (ACARE) [50]. Indeed, the ACARE network recently initiated the SHAERPA (Stopping Androgen Treatment in Patients with HAE—Characterization of Reasons and Protocols and Development of Advice for Patients and Physicians) project with the aim of developing consensus guidance on how to discontinue AA treatment based on patient data. The SHAERPA project will provide a platform for the systematic studies required to support future clinicians when transitioning patients from AAs to targeted therapies.

Recommendations on how to discontinue AAs should include details not only on how to manage discontinuation and changes to HAE attacks but also on how to support patient monitoring and education in order to help clinicians when transitioning patients from AAs to targeted therapies.

In conclusion, discontinuation of AAs is already, and will continue to be, a major topic in HAE management because of side effects, contraindications for AAs, and the availability of better tolerated drugs. While small, our case series highlights the heterogeneity of managing AA withdrawal and the possible destabilization of HAE control, and how replacement therapies are needed to support AA withdrawal for the majority of patients. The ongoing SHAERPA study followed by data‑driven recommendations will support the management of AA discontinuation to improve QoL for HAE patients.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article and its Additional file 1.

Abbreviations

AA:

Attenuated androgen

ACARE:

Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence

AE-QoL:

Angioedema Quality of Life

C1-INH:

C1-inhibitor

HAE:

Hereditary angioedema

IV:

Intravenous

pd:

Plasma-derived

QD:

Every day

QOD:

Every other day

QoL:

Quality of life

rh:

Recombinant human

SC:

Subcutaneous

SHAERPA:

Stopping Androgen Treatment in Patients with HAE—Characterization of Reasons and Protocols and Development of Advice for Patients and Physicians

SPC:

Summary of product characteristics

U:

Units

References

  1. Busse PJ, Christiansen SC. Hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1136–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghazi A, Grant JA. Hereditary angioedema: epidemiology, management, and role of icatibant. Biologics. 2013;7:103–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan AP, Joseph K. The bradykinin-forming cascade and its role in hereditary angioedema. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104(3):193–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuraw BL. The pathophysiology of hereditary angioedema. World Allergy Organ J. 2010;3(9 Suppl):S25–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Farkas H. Hereditary angioedema: examining the landscape of therapies and preclinical therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2019;23(6):457–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maurer M, Magerl M, Ansotegui I, Aygören-Pürsün E, Betschel S, Bork K, et al. The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema—The 2017 revision and update. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1575–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Intravenous C1 inhibitor (Cinryze) summary of product characteristics. Brussels: Shire Services BVBA. 2016.

  8. C1-esterase inhibitor (Berinert) summary of product characteristics. Marburg: CSL Behring GmbH. 2019.

  9. Lanadelumab (TAKHZYRO) summary of product characteristics. Dublin: Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited. 2018.

  10. Berotralstat (Orladeyo) summary of product characteristics. Dublin: BioCryst Ireland Limited. 2021.

  11. Gelfand JA, Sherins RJ, Alling DW, Frank MM. Treatment of hereditary angioedema with danazol—reversal of clinical and biochemical abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 1976;295(26):1444–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Drouet C, Désormeaux A, Robillard J, Ponard D, Bouillet L, Martin L, et al. Metallopeptidase activities in hereditary angioedema: effect of androgen prophylaxis on plasma aminopeptidase P. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(2):429–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Agostoni A, Cicardi M, Martignoni GC, Bergamaschini L, Marasini B. Danazol and stanozolol in long-term prophylactic treatment of hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1980;65(1):75–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gompels MM, Lock RJ, Abinun M, Bethune CA, Davies G, Grattan C, et al. C1 inhibitor deficiency: consensus document. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;139(3):379–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappalardo E, Zingale LC, Cicardi M. Increased expression of C1-inhibitor mRNA in patients with hereditary angioedema treated with danazol. Immunol Lett. 2003;86(3):271–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider LA, Maetzke J, Staib G, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. C1-INH and C3/C4 levels do not correlate with long-term danazole dosage and HAE-1 attack-free interval. Allergy. 2005;60(9):1214–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spaulding WB. Methyltestosterone therapy for hereditary episodic edema (hereditary angioneurotic edema). Ann Intern Med. 1960;53(4):739–45.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Danazol (Danol) summary of product characteristics. Berkshire: Aventis Pharma Limited. 2019.

  19. Bork K, Bygum A, Hardt J. Benefits and risks of danazol in hereditary angioedema: a long-term survey of 118 patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;100(2):153–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zuraw BL, Davis DK, Castaldo AJ, Christiansen SC. Tolerability and effectiveness of 17-α-alkylated androgen therapy for hereditary angioedema: a re-examination. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(5):948–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Riedl MA. Critical appraisal of androgen use in hereditary angioedema: a systematic review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;114(4):281–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Waytes AT, Rosen FS, Frank MM. Treatment of hereditary angioedema with a vapor-heated C1 inhibitor concentrate. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(25):1630–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kunschak M, Engl W, Maritsch F, Rosen FS, Eder G, Zerlauth G, et al. A randomized, controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of C1 inhibitor concentrate in treating hereditary angioedema. Transfusion. 1998;38(6):540–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maurer M, Magerl M. Long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema with androgen derivates: a critical appraisal and potential alternatives. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011;9(2):99–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zotter Z, Veszeli N, Csuka D, Varga L, Farkas H. Frequency of the virilising effects of attenuated androgens reported by women with hereditary angioedema. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9:205.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cicardi M, Castelli R, Zingale LC, Agostoni A. Side effects of long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens in hereditary angioedema: comparison of treated and untreated patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99(2):194–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Széplaki G, Varga L, Valentin S, Kleiber M, Karádi I, Romics L, et al. Adverse effects of danazol prophylaxis on the lipid profiles of patients with hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(4):864–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brunskill PJ. The effects of fetal exposure to danazol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(3):212–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wahn V, Aberer W, Eberl W, Faßhauer M, Kühne T, Kurnik K, et al. Hereditary angioedema (HAE) in children and adolescents—a consensus on therapeutic strategies. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(9):1339–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sattik S, Kumar SP, Nilanjan S, Soumik G, Arjun B. Stanozolol induced precocious puberty. IOSR-JDMS. 2018;17(3):44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davis SM, Lahlou N, Cox-Martin M, Kowal K, Zeitler PS, Ross JL. Oxandrolone treatment results in an increased risk of gonadarche in prepubertal boys with Klinefelter syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(9):3449–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zuraw BL, Busse PJ, White M, Jacobs J, Lumry W, Baker J, et al. Nanofiltered C1 inhibitor concentrate for treatment of hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):513–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Banerji A, Riedl MA, Bernstein JA, Cicardi M, Longhurst HJ, Zuraw BL, et al. Effect of lanadelumab compared with placebo on prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(20):2108–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Longhurst H, Cicardi M, Craig T, Bork K, Grattan C, Baker J, et al. Prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks with a subcutaneous C1 inhibitor. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(12):1131–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aygören-Pürsün E, Bygum A, Grivcheva-Panovska V, Magerl M, Graff J, Steiner UC, et al. Oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor for prophylaxis in hereditary angioedema. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):352–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Longhurst H, Farkas H. Biological therapy in hereditary angioedema: transformation of a rare disease. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020;20(5):493–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zuraw B, Lumry WR, Johnston DT, Aygoren-Pursun E, Banerji A, Bernstein JA, et al. Oral once-daily berotralstat for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021; 148(1):1640–72.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Riedl M, Gower RG, Chrvala CA. Current medical management of hereditary angioedema: results from a large survey of US physicians. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106(4):316–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Riedl MA, Banerji A, Gower R. Current medical management of hereditary angioedema: follow-up survey of US physicians. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3(2):220–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hochberg Z, Pacak K, Chrousos GP. Endocrine withdrawal syndromes. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(4):523–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Medraś M, Tworowska U. Treatment strategies of withdrawal from long-term use of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2001;11(66):535–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Anawalt BD. Diagnosis and management of anabolic androgenic steroid use. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(7):2490–500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Pope HG Jr, Wood RI, Rogol A, Nyberg F, Bowers L, Bhasin S. Adverse health consequences of performance-enhancing drugs: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(3):341–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kanayama G, Hudson JI, Pope HG Jr. Long-term psychiatric and medical consequences of anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse: a looming public health concern? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;98(1–2):1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Johnston DT, Li HH, Craig TJ, Bernstein JA, Anderson J, Joseph K, et al. Androgen use in hereditary angioedema: a critical appraisal and approaches to transitioning from androgens to other therapies. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021;42(1):22–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Keerie C, Tuck C, Milne G, Eldridge S, Wright N, Lewis SC. Data sharing in clinical trials - practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets. Trials. 2018;19(1):25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Riedl MA, Maurer M, Bernstein JA, Banerji A, Longhurst HJ, Li HH, et al. Lanadelumab demonstrates rapid and sustained prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks. Allergy. 2020;75(11):2879–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bernstein JA, Manning ME, Li H, White MV, Baker J, Lumry WR, et al. Escalating doses of C1 esterase inhibitor (CINRYZE) for prophylaxis in patients with hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2(1):77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weller K, Groffik A, Magerl M, Tohme N, Martus P, Krause K, et al. Development, validation, and initial results of the Angioedema Activity Score. Allergy. 2013;68(9):1185–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Maurer M, Aberer W, Agondi R, Al-Ahmad M, Al-Nesf MA, Ansotegui I, et al. Definition, aims, and implementation of GA2LEN/HAEi Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence. Allergy. 2020;75(8):2115–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The expert meeting described in the Patients and methods section was sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Medical writing assistance was provided by Emma Conran, Porterhouse Medical Group, and funded by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc., in line with GPP3 guidelines.

Funding

Open Access funding was enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The expert meeting described in the Patients and methods section was sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The funder had no role in study design, or data collection, analysis or interpretation. Medical writing assistance was provided by Emma Conran, Porterhouse Medical Group, and funded by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc., in line with GPP3 guidelines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the advisory board described in the Methods section, and made substantial contributions to the design of the manuscript, data acquisition and interpretation. All authors have critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version for submission. All authors have agreed to be personally accountable for their own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Maurer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is a retrospective case series with anonymized data, and ethics committee approval is not required. Written informed consent for publication has been provided by all patients, except for one patient who was deceased and for whom consent has been provided by next of kin.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication has been provided by all patients, except for one patient who was deceased and for whom consent has been provided by next of kin.

Competing Interests

All authors received an honorarium for attending the expert meeting described in the Patients and methods section. MMaurer reports grants and/or personal fees from BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., CSL Behring, Dyax Corp., KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Shire/Takeda, Centogene, Pharming, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Pharvaris. MMagerl reports personal fees and/or non-financial support from Shire/Takeda, CSL Behring, Pharming, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., KalVista Pharmaceuticals, and Octapharma AG. EAP reports grants, personal fees and/or support for attending meetings and/or travel from CSL Behring, Shire/Takeda, Centogene, Adverum Biotechnologies, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc, Kalvista Pharmaceuticals, Pharming and Pharvaris. KB reports grants, and/or personal fees from CSL Behring, Shire/Takeda and Pharvaris. HF reports grants and/or personal fees from CSL Behring, Shire/Takeda, Pharming, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and KalVista Pharmaceuticals. HL reports grants, personal fees and/or non-financial support from BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., KalVista Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Takeda, gsk, Pharvaris and Pfizer. SK-A reports personal fees from BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Takeda and CSL Behring. LB reports no further disclosures. IB-G reports grants, personal fees and/or non-financial support from Takeda, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, and Pharming. MC reports personal fees from BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Kalvista Pharmaceuticals. AZ reports personal fees from CSL Behring, Sobi and Takeda. DL reports grants and personal fees from gsk and Actelion. Professor Launay reports grants, consulting fees and personal fees from BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, and Shire/Takeda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Word document.doc; Patient cases; Further details of attenuated androgen discontinuation in hereditary angioedema cases series.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maurer, M., Magerl, M., Aygören-Pürsün, E. et al. Attenuated androgen discontinuation in patients with hereditary angioedema: a commented case series. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 18, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00644-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00644-0

Keywords

  • Angioedema, hereditary
  • Prophylaxis
  • Attenuated androgens
  • Danazol
  • Oxandrolone
  • Case series