Open Access

Tropomyosin, the major tropical oyster Crassostrea belcheri allergen and effect of cooking on its allergenicity

  • Zailatul Hani Mohamad Yadzir1, 2Email author,
  • Rosmilah Misnan2,
  • Faizal Bakhtiar1,
  • Noormalin Abdullah1 and
  • Shahnaz Murad1
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology201511:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-015-0099-4

Received: 22 July 2015

Accepted: 15 October 2015

Published: 26 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Many types of shellfish including oysters are sometime cooked before ingestion and it has been demonstrated that cooking may affect the allergenicity of food. Therefore, the aim of our present study is to identify major and minor allergens of tropical oyster (Crassostrea belcheri) and to investigate the effect of different cooking processing on the allergenicity of this oyster.

Methods

Raw, boiled, fried and roasted extracts of oyster were prepared. Protein profiles were analysed using sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Major and minor allergens and allergenicity patterns of all extracts were then determined by immunoblotting with sera from patients with positive skin prick tests (SPT) to the raw oyster extract. Mass-spectrometry was used to identify the major allergenic proteins of this oyster.

Results

SDS-PAGE of the raw extract showed 15 protein bands (20–180 kDa). In contrast, smaller numbers of protein bands were demonstrated in the boiled extract, those ranging between 40–42 and 55–150 kDa were denatured, whereas the protein profiles were altered to a similar degree by frying or roasting. The 37 kDa proteins had the highest frequency of IgE-binding (95 %), thus identified as the major allergen of this tropical oyster. Other minor IgE-binding proteins were observed at various molecular weights. Immunoblot of raw extract yielded 11 IgE-binding proteins. The cooked extracts showed only a single IgE-binding protein at 37 kDa. Mass spectrometry analysis of the 37 kDa major allergen identified this spot as tropomyosin.

Conclusions

Cooked extracts produce lower IgE-binding than raw extract, which suggest that thermal treatment can be used as a tool in attempting to reduce oyster allergenicity by reducing the number of IgE-reactive bands. The degree of allergenicity of this oyster was demonstrated in the order raw > boiled > fried ≈ roasted. A heat-resistent 37 kDa protein, corresponding to tropomyosin, was identified as the major allergen of this tropical oyster.

Keywords

Tropical oyster Crassostrea belcheri IgE reactivity Tropomyosin Major allergen Immunoblot Cooking processing

Background

Oysters are naturally one of the most nutritionally well balanced of foods [1]. They are low in fat, calories and cholesterol in addition to being high in protein, iron, omega 3 fatty acids, calcium, zinc and vitamin C [1]. Unfortunately, oysters are also one of an elicitors of IgE-mediated type I allergy [24].

It is well documented that the ingestion of oyster, skin and mucosal contact and the inhalation of aerosolized oyster proteins during cooking or in an occupational setting can cause a large variety of clinical symptoms in sensitized patients, such as urticaria, angioedema, atopic dermatitis, asthma, rhinitis, vomiting, diarrhea and anaphylaxis [24].

Currently, the only effective treatment to prevent oyster-induced allergies is a specific avoidance diet [5]. However, avoidance is often difficult due to unintentional cross-contamination or the addition of oyster as ingredients in some common sauces and condiments [5].

The identification of allergenic proteins in a particular species is an important step for the development of more accurate allergy tests and for the definition of more effective management of patients [68]. Until now, tropomyosin was the only well recognized allergen in oyster [9, 10]. Tropomyosins are highly conserved proteins with a typical coiled-coil structure that are necessary for regulating muscle contraction [1113]. The highly conserved amino acid sequence of tropomyosin is responsible for its identification as a panallergen for cross-reactivity between crustaceans, molluscs, insects and arachnids [11, 1423].

Oyster may be consumed raw or cooked. Cooked oysters are usually subjected to some form of heat treatment including boiling, frying or roasting to enhance texture and flavours or to ensure microbiological safety. At the same time, heating can alter proteins by inducing denaturation (loss in tertiary and/or secondary interactions), formation of new intra- or inter-molecular bonds, aggregation, and/or rearrangements of disulfide bonds, as well as other conformational modifications, which can ultimately lead to changes in allergen reactivity [24]. In some cases, thermal treatment has been shown to decrease allergen reactivity [2426], yet in other cases, thermal treatment increases allergen potency [2729], possibly by exposing new IgE-binding sites. Therefore, understanding thermal treatment seems to be important in oyster allergenicity.

Crassostrea belcheri (tropical oyster) is a commonly consumed oyster in Malaysia. Our previous study indicated that it has provoked allergenic reactions in some individuals [30], but there has been no study about the allergenic proteins of this local oyster. The aim of this study was to identify the major allergenic proteins of the tropical oyster and to investigate the effect of different cooking methods on the allergenicity of this oyster.

Methods

Preparation of tropical oyster extracts

For the preparation of the raw oyster (Crassostrea belcheri) extract, the inner muscle tissue was homogenized in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2 and extracted overnight at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation at 4500 and 14,000 rpm, for 30 and 15 min, respectively. The clear supernatant was then recovered and sterilized by passing through a 0.22 μm syringe filter, frozen and lyophilized. The lyophilized extracts were stored at −20 °C until use. The boiled oyster extract was prepared by boiling muscle tissue for 10 min at 100 °C, the fried oyster extract was carried out by frying muscle tissue with vegetable oil for 10 min and the roasted oyster extract was prepared by roasting at 180 °C for 10 min followed by homogenization according to the same protocol as above. Protein concentrations of the extracts were determined using the total protein kit (Sigma, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the protein standard.

Human sera

Sera of 20 patients with a history of oyster allergy and a positive skin prick test (SPT) to raw oyster extract were used in this study. This study was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee (MREC), Ministry of Health Malaysia and informed consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), two dimensional-gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE and 2-DE were carried out as described previously [15, 16]. The components of extracts from oyster that were separated by gel electrophoresis and recognized by IgE antibodies in sera were then analyzed by immunoblotting [15, 16].

Mass spectrometry analysis

The Coomassie-stained protein spots corresponding to those recognized by the above sera were manually excised and transferred to microcentrifuge tubes. These protein spots were analyzed using mass spectrometry analysis by First Base Laboratories Sdn Bhd, Malaysia. Protein samples were trypsin digested and peptides extracted according to standard techniques. Peptides were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer using a 4800 Proteomics Analyzer. Spectra were analyzed to identify proteins of interest using Mascot sequence matching software (Matrix Science) with Ludwig NR Database and taxonomy set to other metazoa.

Results

Oyster protein profiles and IgE-binding proteins

SDS-PAGE of raw oyster extract demonstrated 15 protein bands in the range of 20–180 kDa. Fewer bands were detected in the boiled extract as several protein bands between 40–42 and 55–150 kDa were sensitive to heat and thus were no longer detected in the gel. On the other hand, most of the protein bands in fried and roasted extracts were completely denatured. Therefore, they were identified as heat-sensitive proteins. In contrast, a 37 kDa protein was very stable to heating and it can be detected in all oyster extracts even after boiling, frying or roasting (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

SDS-PAGE profiles of raw (a), boiled (b), fried (c) and roasted (d) extracts of Crassostrea belcheri (tropical oyster). Lane M molecular mass markers

Twelve components with molecular weights ranging from about 20–180 kDa showed IgE-binding activity in the raw oyster extract. Regarding IgE reactivity, each patient had different patterns of IgE recognition (1–12 IgE-binding bands). The component with a molecular weight of about 37 kDa showed the highest frequency of IgE-binding (95 %) and was identified as the major allergen for this oyster (Fig. 2a). IgE-binding proteins were also detected at 5 % (150 kDa), 10 % (33 kDa), 15 % (180, 75, 36, 30, 20 kDa), 20 % (100 kDa), 25 % (90, 65 kDa), 30 % (25 kDa), 35 % (40 kDa) and 45 % (50, 42 kDa), but only as minor allergens.
Fig. 2

Immunoblotting of raw (a), boiled (b), fried (c) and roasted (d) extracts of Crassostrea belcheri (tropical oyster). Lane M molecular mass markers, lanes 120 immunoblots showing binding of IgE from different serum samples, lane N immunoblot using serum from a non-allergic individual, and lane B blank

On the other hand, immunoblotting of the cooked extracts detected only one IgE-binding at 37 kDa and more staining to this band was observed in most sera tested (Fig. 2b–d). No binding was observed in the negative control and blank strip.

Oyster 2-DE profiles and IgE-binding spots

Figure 3a demonstrated the 2-dimensional gel map of proteins from the raw oyster extract. About 50 spots with molecular masses from 20 to 180 kDa and isoelectric point (pI) between 4 and 8 were visible with coomassie blue staining. The simple IgE-stained patterns of the oyster protein spots obtained with four sera are shown in Fig. 3b. A highly reactive protein spot with a molecular mass of 37 kDa and pI of 4.57 was observed in all of the patients’ serum samples tested.
Fig. 3

Two dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblot analysis of Crassostrea belcheri (tropical oyster). a Coomassie blue stained blot; b immunoblot with individual patients’ sera. Spot number 1 was sent for mass spectrometry analysis. Lane M molecular mass markers

Allergen identification

In the peptide mass fingerprint analysis, the excised protein spot number 1 showed the highest correlation with tropomyosin from Pacific oyster C. gigas (accession no. B7XC66) with peptide sequence coverage of 38 %. The corresponding sequence coverage is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Protein spot 1 peptide mass fingerprint analysis which correlates with Crassostrea gigas. Matched peptides shown in bold red

Discussion

Cooking which can be considered a form of thermal treatment affect the allergenicity of the oyster protein. In our study, cooking processing, such as boiling, frying and roasting, produced changes on the SDS-PAGE protein profile of oyster allergens. Differences seen in these protein profiles may be attributed to temperatures at which each heat treatment was executed. Roasting and frying were performed at higher temperatures (180 and 120 °C, respectively) whereas boiling was performed at relatively lower temperatures (100 °C). Compared to the raw extracts, boiling causes a remarkable reduction in the number of protein bands between 40–42 and 55–150 kDa. Both frying and roasting showed a similar protein profile, with most of the bands clearly eliminated compared with those of the raw and boiled extracts. In contrast, a prominent heat-resistant 37 kDa protein was detected in the SDS-PAGE even after boiling, frying or roasting. Many food allergens are resistant to denaturation, which allows them to retain the ability to elicit an immune reaction under conditions such as heating and enzymatic degradation [31].

The loss of proteins in boiled, fried and roasted extracts may be related to the effects of heat on them. Thermal treatment can potentially cause protein modifications, which include protein fragmentation, denaturation, or intra- or inter-molecular protein crosslinking [3235]. Fragmented protein sections that are smaller than the resolution limit of the gel may travel through the acrylamide pores more quickly, causing them to ultimately be lost in the buffer. Conversely, proteins that have been modified by intermolecular crosslinking (i.e., protein aggregation) are often too large to migrate through the gel, and are not clearly detectable via SDS-PAGE, but may appear congested in the wells of the gel [32, 33, 35]. However, proteins modified via covalent modification such as intramolecular crosslinking can maintain approximately the same molecular weight, yet may often migrate through polyacrylamide gels with slight difficulty, as they are not completely linearized under reducing conditions. Thus, the protein bands corresponding to the modified proteins can have a smeared appearance in immunoblotting analyses [34]. This was apparent in Fig. 2b–d, where 37 kDa bands were notably smeared in cooked extracts; therefore, it appears that thermal treatments may have caused oyster allergen modification via a putative covalent modification. This speculates that the conformational modification of the 37 kDa allergen may have changed the reactivity of the allergen by altering IgE-binding epitopes. Taheri-Kafrani et al. [33] have shown that covalent modifications, such as glycation, have been attributed to the Maillard reaction, where reducing sugars interact with proteins in a non-enzymatic browning reaction. Previous experiments using scallop tropomyosin displayed an increase in allergen potency with the progression of the Maillard reaction [36]. Kamath et al. [37] also reported that tropomyosin from oyster C. gigas has been shown to increase with heating as detected by monoclonal antibodies possibly due to the Maillard reaction. The effects of the Maillard reaction appear to be dependent on the sample and the amount and type of reducing sugars present, as well as many other variables, such as treatment temperature.

Allergens can be defined as being either major or minor. A major allergen is defined as one, recognized by IgE from more than 50 % of individuals sensitive to the particular food from where the allergen originate [38]. Until now, tropomyosin was the only well recognized allergen in oyster [9, 10]. Tropomyosin, with a molecular weight of about 34–38 kDa, is a group of highly conserved actin-binding protein present in muscle and non-muscle cells and plays a central role in muscle contraction [1113]. Similarly, our study has also identified the 37 kDa major allergen as tropomyosin by mass spectrometry analysis. Our findings confirmed and strengthened earlier reports on the heat stability of tropomyosin. After heat treatment, only tropomyosin exhibited the IgE-binding capacity. Tropomyosin is heat resistant and retains its IgE-binding ability even after prolonged heating [37, 39, 40]. The ability of tropomyosin to withstand heat-treatment and most known type of food processing techniques can be attributed to its exceptionally stable alpha helical coiled-coil secondary structure [22, 38].

Conclusions

In conclusion, thermal treatment can be used as a tool to reduce oyster allergenicity by reducing the number of allergens. A heat-resistent 37 kDa protein, corresponding to tropomyosin, was identified as the major allergen of this tropical oyster.

Abbreviations

SPT: 

Skin prick test

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis

2-DE: 

two dimensional-gel electrophoresis

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZHMY: performing laboratory tests, interpretation of results and analysis, writing the paper. RM: interpretation of results and analysis, critical revision of the paper. FB: performing SPT, interpretation of results and analysis, critical revision of the paper. NA: performing SPT. SM: final approval of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Director General of Health, Malaysia for permission to publish this paper. This work was supported by a Grant UPSI 2015-0048-101-01.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Allergy and Immunology Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research
(2)
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

References

  1. Asha KK, Anandan R, Mathew S, Lakshmanan PT. Biochemical profile of oyster Crassostrea madrasensis and its nutritional attributes. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2014;40(1):35–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rance F, Grandmottet X, Grandjean H. Prevalence and main characteristics of school children diagnosed with food allergies in France. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35(2):167–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gonzalez Galan I, Garcia Menaya JM, Jimenez Ferrera G, Gonzalez Mateos G. Anaphylactic shock to oysters and white fish with generalized urticaria to prawns and white fish. Allergol Immunopathol. 2002;30(5):300–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Castillo R, Delgado J, Quiralte J, Blanco C, Carillo T. Food hypersensitivity among adult patients: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Allergol Immunopathol. 1996;24(3):93–7.Google Scholar
  5. Taylor SL. Molluscan shellfish allergy. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2008;54:139–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciardiello MA, Tamburrini M, Liso M, Crescenzo R, Rafaiani C, Mari A. Food allergen profiling: a big challenge. Food Res Int. 2013;54(1):1033–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zuidmeer-Jongejan L, Fernandez-Rivas M, Poulsen L, Neubauer A, Asturias J, Blom L, et al. FAST: towards safe and effective subcutaneous immunotherapy of persistent life-threatening food allergies. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012;2(1):5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-2-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Woo CK, Bahna SL. Not all shellfish “allergy” is allergy! Clin Transl Allergy. 2011;1:3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-1-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Leung PS, Chu KH. cDNA cloning and molecular identification of the major oyster allergen from the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(8):1287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishikawa M, Ishida M, Shimakura K, Nagashima Y, Shiomi K. Tropomyosin, the major oyster Crassostrea gigas allergen and its IgE-binding epitopes. J Food Sci. 1998;63(1):44–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Lopata AL, Kamath S. Shellfish allergy diagnosis- gaps and needs. Curr Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;25(2):60–6.Google Scholar
  12. Suzuki M, Kobayashi Y, Hiraki Y, Nakata H, Shiomi K. Paramyosin of the disc abalone Haliotis discus discus: identification as a new allergen and cross-reactivity with tropomyosin. Food Chem. 2011;124(3):921–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Thammathongchat S, Hagiwara T, Sakiyama T. Adsorption of tropomyosin from pink shrimp (Pandalus eous) on stainless steel surface. Food Control. 2010;21(9):1250–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Abramovitch JB, Kamath S, Varese N, Zubrinich C, Lopata AL, O’Hehir RE, et al. IgE reactivity of blue swimmer crab (Portunus pelagicus) Tropomyosin, Por p 1, and other allergens; cross-reactivity with black tiger prawn and effects of heating. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67487.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Yadzir ZH, Misnan R, Abdullah N, Bakhtiar F, Arip M, Murad S. Identification of the major allergen of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (giant freshwater prawn). Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(1):50–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yadzir ZH, Misnan R, Murad S. Identification of tropomyosin as major allergen of white squid (Loligo edulis) by two-dimensional immunoblotting and mass spectrometry. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2012;43(1):185–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosmilah M, Shahnaz M, Zailatul HM, Noormalin A, Normilah I. Identification of tropomyosin and arginine kinase as major allergens of Portunus pelagicus (blue swimming crab). Trop Biomed. 2012;29(3):467–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Misnan R, Murad S, Yadzir ZH, Abdullah N. Identification of the major allergens of Charybdis feriatus (red crab) and its cross-reactivity with Portunus pelagicus (blue crab). Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2012;30(4):285–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Abdel Rahman AM. Lopata AL, O’Hehir RE, Robinson JJ, Banoub JH, Helleur RJ. Characterization and de novo sequencing of snow crab tropomyosin enzymatic peptides by both electrospray ionization and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization QToF tandem mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45(4):372–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Emoto A, Ishizaki S, Shiomi K. Tropomyosins in gastropods and bivalves: identification as major allergens and amino acid sequence features. Food Chem. 2009;114(2):634–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ayuso R, Reese G, Leong-Kee S, Plante M, Lehrer SB. Molecular basis of arthropod cross-reactivity: IgE-binding cross-reactive epitopes of shrimp, house dust mite and cockroach tropomyosins. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;129(1):38–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Reese G, Ayuso R, Lehrer SB. Tropomyosin: an invertebrate pan-allergen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1999;119(4):247–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leung PS, Chow WK, Duffey S, Kwan HS, Gershwin ME, Chu KH. IgE reactivity against a cross-reactive allergen in Crustacea and Mollusca: evidence for tropomyosin as the common allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;98(5 Pt 1):954–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mondoulet L, Paty E, Drumare MF, Ah-Leung S, Scheinmann P, Willemot RM, et al. Influence of thermal processing on the allergenicity of peanut proteins. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(11):4547–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen L, Phillips R. Effects of Twin-Screw Extrusion of Peanut Flour on In Vitro Digestion of Potentially Allergenic Peanut Proteins. J Food Protect. 2005;68(8):1712–9.Google Scholar
  26. Beyer K, Morrow E, Li XM, Bardina L, Bannon GA, Burks AW, et al. Effects of cooking methods on peanut allergenicity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;107(6):1077–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Leszczynska J, Lacka A, Szemraj J, Lukamowicz J, Zegota H. The effect of microwave treatment on the immunoreactivity of gliadin and wheat flour. Eur Food Res Technol. 2003;217(5):387–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Simonato B, Pasini G, Giannattasio M, Peruffo ADB, De Lazzari F, Curioni A. Food allergy to wheat products: the effect of bread baking and in vitro digestion on wheat allergenic proteins. A study with bread dough, crumb, and crust. J Agr Food Chem. 2001;49(1):5668–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pasini G, Simonato B, Giannattasio M, Peruffo ADB, Curioni A. Modifications of wheat flour proteins during in vitro digestion of bread dough, crumb, and crust: an electrophoretic and immunological study. J Agr Food Chem. 2001;49(5):2254–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Shahnaz M, Gendeh BS, Nasuruddin A. Skin test reactivity to inhalant and food allergens in patients with allergic rhinitis. J Int Med Res. 2001;5(2):69–73.Google Scholar
  31. Ebo D, Stevens W. IgE mediated food allergy: extensive review of the literature. Acta Clin Belg. 2001;56(4):234–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliveira TC, Lima SL, Bressan J. Influences of different thermal processings in milk, bovine meat and frog protein structure. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(3):896–902.Google Scholar
  33. Taheri-Kafrani A, Gaudin JC, Rabesona H, Nioi C, Aqarwal D, Drouet M, et al. Effects of heating and glycation of beta-lactoglobulin on its recognition by IgE of sera from cow milk allergy patients. J Agr Food Chem. 2009;57(11):4974–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chatterjee U, Mondal G, Chakraborti P, Patra HK, Chatterjee BP. Changes in the allergenicity during different preparations of pomfret, hilsa, bhetki and mackerel fish as illustrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblotting. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006;141(1):1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shriver SK, Yang WW. Thermal and nonthermal methods for food allergen control. Food Eng Rev. 2011;3:26–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamura A, Watanabe K, Ojima T, Ahn DH, Saeki H. Effect of maillard reaction on allergenicity of scallop tropomyosin. J Agr Food Chem. 2009;53(19):7559–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kamath SD. Abdel Rahman AM, Komoda T, Lopata AL. Impact of heat processing on the detection of the major shellfish allergen tropomyosin in crustaceans and molluscs using specific monoclonal antibodies. Food Chem. 2013;141(4):4031–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bangping W, Zhenxing L, Lina Z, Yixuan L, Hong L. Identification and characterization of a new IgE-binding protein in mackerel (Scomber japonicus) by MALDI-TOF-MS. J Ocean Univ China. 2011;10(1):93–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Motoyama K, Suma Y, Ishizaki S, Nagashima Y, Shiomi K. Molecular cloning of tropomyosin identified as allergens in six species of crustaceans. J Agr Food Chem. 2007;55(3):985–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Leung PSC, Chen YC, Gershwin ME, Wong SH, Kwan SH, Chu KH. Identification and molecular characterization of Charybdis feriatus tropomyosin, the major crab allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102(5):847–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yadzir et al. 2015

Advertisement