Skip to main content



Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic allergic reaction with varied mechanisms and clinical presentations. Although prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative, both patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize and diagnose early signs and symptoms of the condition. Clinical manifestations vary widely; however, the most common signs are cutaneous symptoms, including urticaria, angioedema, erythema and pruritus. Immediate intramuscular administration of epinephrine into the anterolateral thigh is first-line therapy, even if the diagnosis is uncertain. The mainstays of long-term management include specialist assessment, avoidance measures, and the provision of an epinephrine auto-injector and an individualized anaphylaxis action plan. This article provides an overview of the causes, clinical features, diagnosis and acute and long-term management of this serious allergic reaction.


Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of an allergic reaction—it is rapid in onset and potentially fatal. While the prevalence of anaphylaxis is estimated to be as high as 2% and appears to be increasing, the fatality rate is extremely low (i.e., < 0.0001% prevalence in the general population, or < 0.5% case fatality rate in those hospitalized or presenting to the emergency department with anaphylaxis) and appears to be decreasing [1,2,3]. Nonetheless, it is essential to be vigilant for those at risk of anaphylaxis, and to establish appropriate measures with the goal of reducing the risk of death from anaphylaxis even further.

Prompt recognition and management of anaphylaxis are imperative. However, the condition is often under-recognized and treated inadequately. Diagnosis and management are challenging since reactions are often immediate and unexpected. Furthermore, there is no single test to diagnose anaphylaxis in routine clinical practice. This article will provide an overview of the causes and clinical features of anaphylaxis as well as strategies for the accurate diagnosis and management of the condition.


Most episodes of anaphylaxis are triggered through an immunologic mechanism involving immunoglobulin E (IgE) which leads to mast cell and basophil activation and the subsequent release of inflammatory mediators such as histamine, platelet activating factor, leukotrienes, tryptase and prostaglandins. Although any substance has the potential to cause anaphylaxis, the most common causes of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis are foods (particularly peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish and fish, cow’s milk, eggs and wheat), medications (most commonly penicillin and other antibiotics), and stinging insects [4]. Exercise, aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), opiates, and radiocontrast agents can also cause anaphylaxis, but anaphylactic reactions to these agents often result from non-IgE-mediated mechanisms. In other cases, the cause of anaphylactic reactions is unknown (idiopathic anaphylaxis). In children, anaphylaxis is most often caused by foods, while venom- and drug-induced anaphylaxis is more common in adults [5,6,7,8]. Table 1 provides a more comprehensive list of the potential causes of anaphylaxis.

Table 1 Causes of anaphylaxis


Co-morbidities and medications may also affect the severity of anaphylactic reactions and patient response to treatment. For example, patients with asthma and cardiovascular disease are more likely to experience a poor outcome from anaphylaxis. Concurrent administration of beta-blockers can interfere with the patient’s ability to respond to epinephrine, the first-line of treatment for anaphylaxis (discussed later). Additionally, the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may impact a patient’s compensatory physiologic response to anaphylaxis, leading to more severe reactions, although evidence is conflicting [4, 5]. In fact, recent evidence suggests that the use of any antihypertensive medication may worsen an anaphylactic reaction [9].

Signs and symptoms

As anaphylaxis is a generalized systemic reaction, a wide variety of clinical signs and symptoms involving the skin, gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, and cardiovascular system can be observed (see Table 2). The most common clinical manifestations are cutaneous symptoms, including urticaria and angioedema, erythema (flushing), and pruritus (itching) [10]. Patients also often describe an impending sense of death (angor animi). Death due to anaphylaxis usually occurs as a result of respiratory obstruction or cardiovascular collapse, or both. It is important to note that the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis are unpredictable and may vary from patient to patient and from one reaction to another. Therefore, the absence of one or more of the common symptoms listed in Table 2 does not rule out anaphylaxis, and should not delay immediate treatment.

Table 2 Signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis [10, 16]

The signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis typically develop within minutes after exposure to the offending antigen, but may occasionally occur as late as 1 h post exposure. Symptoms usually follow a uniphasic course, with resolution of symptoms within hours of treatment. However, between 0.4 and 15% of reactions follow a biphasic course [11] characterized by an asymptomatic period of several hours (1–36 h; mean of 10 h in one case series) [12] followed by recurrent symptoms.


The diagnosis of anaphylaxis during an acute episode is based primarily on clinical signs and symptoms. Following the acute episode, confirmation of the diagnosis requires a detailed description of the acute episode, including antecedent activities and events. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis were published by a multidisciplinary group of experts in 2005 and 2006, and are shown in Table 3 [13, 14]. Since confirming the diagnosis and etiology of anaphylaxis is often complex, referral to an allergist with training and expertise in the identification and management of anaphylaxis is strongly encouraged.

Table 3 Clinical criteria for diagnosing anaphylaxis [13, 14]


The clinical history is the most important tool to establish the cause of anaphylaxis and must take precedence over diagnostic tests. It should elicit information about clinical manifestations (e.g., urticaria, angioedema, flushing, pruritus, airway obstruction, gastrointestinal symptoms, syncope, and hypotension), agents encountered immediately prior to the onset of the reaction (e.g. foods, medications or insect bites/stings), as well as the patient’s activities preceding the event (e.g., exercise, sexual activity). The absence of cutaneous symptoms puts the diagnosis in question, since the majority of anaphylactic episodes include cutaneous symptoms; however, their absence does not rule out anaphylaxis [5].

Diagnostic tests

The diagnosis of a specific cause of anaphylaxis may be supported by the results of skin tests and/or in vitro IgE tests [5]. These tests can determine the presence of specific IgE antibodies to foods, medications (e.g., penicillin), and stinging insects. However, for the majority of medications, standardized skin tests and/or in vitro tests are not available.

The clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis can sometimes be supported by the documentation of elevated concentrations of mast cell and basophil mediators such as plasma histamine or serum or plasma total tryptase. However, it is critical to obtain blood samples for these measurements as soon as possible after the onset of symptoms since elevations are transient.

Differential diagnosis

Other diagnoses that might present with signs and/or symptoms characteristic of anaphylaxis should be excluded. The most common conditions that mimic anaphylaxis include: vasovagal reactions (characterized by hypotension, pallor, bradycardia, weakness, nausea and vomiting), vocal cord dysfunction, severe acute asthma, foreign body aspiration, pulmonary embolism, acute anxiety (e.g., panic attack or hyperventilation syndrome), myocardial dysfunction, acute poisoning, hypoglycemia, and seizure [5, 15]. Recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis may suggest underlying systemic mastocytosis.


Acute management

The acute treatment of anaphylaxis begins with a rapid assessment of circulation and breathing, followed by the immediate administration of epinephrine. Epinephrine is the drug of choice for anaphylaxis and should be given immediately to any patient with suspected anaphylaxis. Treatment should be provided even if the diagnosis is uncertain since there is no contraindication to the use of epinephrine [16].

The recommended dose of epinephrine for anaphylaxis is 0.01 mg/kg (maximum 0.5 mg) administered intramuscularly every 5–15 min as necessary [5, 17]. Intramuscular administration into the anterolateral thigh is recommended as it allows for more rapid absorption and higher plasma epinephrine levels compared to subcutaneous or intramuscular administration in the upper arm [18, 19]. Glucagon should also be considered in patients using beta-blockers.

All patients receiving emergency epinephrine must be transported to hospital immediately (ideally by ambulance) for evaluation and observation. Ideally, patients should be placed in a recumbent (supine) position, unless the respiratory compromise contraindicates it, to prevent or to counteract potential circulatory collapse. Pregnant patients should be placed on their left side [5]. Once supine, patients should not be allowed to sit up until clearly fully stabilized, owing to the risk of ‘empty ventricle syndrome’ which can precipitate a profound loss of blood pressure and death [20].

As mentioned earlier, patients with asthma, particularly those with poorly controlled asthma, are at increased risk of a fatal reaction. In these patients, anaphylaxis may be mistaken for an asthma exacerbation and inappropriately treated solely with asthma inhalers. Therefore, if there are ongoing asthma symptoms in an individual with known anaphylaxis, epinephrine should be given [16].

Supportive therapy such as inhaled beta2-agonists (for patients experiencing bronchospasm) and antihistamines (for control of cutaneous symptoms) can also be helpful, but should never replace epinephrine as first-line therapy. Oxygen therapy should also be considered in any patient with symptoms of anaphylaxis, particularly for those with prolonged reactions. Intravenous crystalloid solutions should also be provided since massive fluid shifts can occur rapidly in anaphylaxis due to increased vascular permeability. Volume replacement is particularly important for patients who have persistent hypotension despite epinephrine injections. Vasopressors, such as dopamine, can also be considered if epinephrine injections and volume expansion with intravenous fluids fail to alleviate hypotension. Corticosteroids have a slow onset of action and, therefore, these agents have not been shown to be effective for the acute treatment of anaphylaxis. Theoretically, however, they may prevent biphasic or protracted reactions and, hence, are often given on an empirical basis. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that the administration of corticosteroids prevents a biphasic response [5]. In fact, a recent non-randomized study suggested a number needed to treat (NNT) of 173–176 to prevent a biphasic reaction [21].

If anaphylaxis fails to respond to intramuscular epinephrine and intravenous fluids, an intravenous infusion of epinephrine may be required; however, these infusions should be given by a physician who is trained and experienced in its use and has the capacity for continuous blood pressure and cardiac monitoring.

Figure 1 provides a simplified algorithm for the acute management of anaphylaxis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Simplified algorithm for the acute management of anaphylaxis. IV intravenous. *Should be given by a physician trained in the use of IV epinephrine with capacity for continuous blood pressure and cardiac monitoring

Following acute treatment, patients should be observed for a period of time due to the risk of a biphasic response or possible recurrence of the reaction as epinephrine wears off. The observation period should be individualized based on the severity of the initial reaction and access to care. Experts have recommended observing patients for 4–6 h following an anaphylactic reaction, with prolonged observation times for patients with severe or refractory symptoms [16].

Long-term management

The mainstays of long-term management for patients who have experienced anaphylaxis include: specialist assessment, a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector, patient and caregiver education on avoidance measures, and the provision of an individualized anaphylaxis action plan.

Specialist assessment

After acute anaphylaxis, patients should be assessed for their future risk of anaphylaxis, ideally by an allergist. These specialists are experienced in identifying and confirming the cause of anaphylaxis, educating patients on appropriate avoidance strategies, drafting an anaphylaxis action plan, and advising whether immunotherapy is appropriate [5, 16].

Prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector

A prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector should be provided to all patients who have experienced anaphylaxis previously, including those who have had any rapid-onset systemic allergic reaction (gastrointestinal, respiratory, cardiac); diffuse hives to any food or insect stings; or any rapid-onset (i.e., minutes to hours) reaction of any severity to the highest risk foods such as peanut, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish [16].

EpiPen® is currently the only epinephrine auto-injector available in Canada, although the Taro-Epinephrine Auto Injector® has been approved by Health Canada but is not yet available. Both products come in two dosages (0.15 and 0.30 mg), which are prescribed according to weight. The 0.30 mg dosage should be used for those weighing 30 kg or more, and the 0.15 mg dosage for children weighing between 15 and 30 kg. Certain sources recommend switching to the 0.30 mg dose at 25 kg rather than 30 kg [22]. These devices should be stored properly (avoiding temperature extremes) and replaced before the expiration date.

Upon prescription of an epinephrine auto-injector, healthcare providers must instruct the patient on how and when to use the device. Instructions on proper use should be reviewed verbally and accompanied by website links and/or written material, and should be reinforced annually.

The currently available epinephrine auto-injectors have needle lengths of approximately 13 and 15 mm for the 0.15 and 0.30 mg doses, respectively. Recent studies suggest that, at these needle lengths, children weighing less than 15 kg are at increased risk of injection into the bone [23] and adult females are at increased risk of subcutaneous injection [24]. Therefore, special counseling on appropriate epinephrine administration in these patients may be needed.

Avoidance/recognition of co-factors for increased anaphylaxis risk

Patients should be educated on certain co-factors that can lead to an increasingly severe anaphylactic reaction. Exercise can significantly increase the likelihood and/or severity of allergic reactions. Other significant co-factors include: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/NSAID use, alcohol use, menses, and concomitant viral illnesses [25].

Education on avoidance measures

Patients and their caregivers should be educated about agents or exposures that may place them at risk for future reactions, and should be counselled on avoidance measures that may be used to reduce the risk for such exposures. Avoidance strategies should be individualized, taking into consideration factors such as relevant triggers, age, activity, occupation, hobbies, residential conditions, access to medical care, and the patient’s level of personal anxiety. Individuals who have had anaphylactic reactions to foods should be instructed to read food labels carefully, watching for hidden ingredients such as “natural flavour” or “spices” that may indicate the presence of allergens (e.g., peanut, tree nuts, milk, egg, shellfish, fish, sesame, soy and wheat), as well as “may contain” warnings [5]. Recent evidence suggests that peanut allergic children can be desensitized to peanut by feeding them increasing amounts of peanut under close supervision [26]. Similar results have been noted for egg and milk allergy. Although these results are promising, further confirmatory studies in this area are needed before routinely recommending desensitization procedures to patients with these food allergies (for more information, see IgE-Mediated Food Allergy and Non-IgE-Mediated Food Hypersensitivity articles in this supplement).

Patients with anaphylaxis to medications should be informed about all cross-reacting medications that should be avoided. Should there be a future essential indication for use of the medication causing anaphylactic reactions, it may be helpful to educate patients about possible management options, such as medication pretreatment and use of low osmolarity agents in patients with a history of reactions to radiographic contrast media, or induction of drug tolerance procedures (also known as drug desensitization) [5]. Induction of drug tolerance procedures temporarily modify a patient’s immunologic or non-immunologic response to a drug through the administration of incremental doses of the drug. However, drug tolerance is usually maintained only as long as the drug is administered; therefore, the procedure needs to be repeated in the future if the patient requires the drug again after finishing a prior therapeutic course (for more information, see Drug Allergy article in this supplement).

Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to an insect sting should be advised about avoidance measures to reduce the risk of future stings. Such measures include: being alert when eating outdoors (as wasps are attracted to food), wearing shoes and long pants when in fields, and having nests or hives near the patient’s home removed [15]. More importantly, however, patients who have previously experienced venom-induced anaphylaxis are often candidates for venom immunotherapy, which is successful in preventing anaphylaxis in up to 98% of patients (see Allergen-specific Immunotherapy article in this supplement), and all should be referred for an allergy assessment.

Patients should also obtain and wear medical identification (such as a MedicAlert® bracelet/necklace) that indicates that they have experienced anaphylaxis as well as the responsible agent. Patients should also be instructed to avoid drugs that might increase their susceptibility and/or complicate the management of an anaphylactic event, such as beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors [5].

Anaphylaxis action plan

A comprehensive, individualized anaphylaxis action plan should be prepared which defines roles and responsibilities and emergency protocols. Important information that should be included in this plan is shown in Table 4 [16, 27]. Examples of such a plan, along with other relevant information and materials, can be downloaded at Food Allergy Canada ( or Food Allergy Research and Education (; a US-based association). Action plans should be reviewed annually and updated if necessary. A copy of the plan should be made available to all relevant persons, such as day-care providers, teachers, and employers. Recommendations for the management of anaphylaxis in schools and other community settings [28] are available through Food Allergy Canada ( or the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI) (see

Table 4 Components of an anaphylaxis action plan [16, 27]


Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal systemic reaction with varied mechanisms and clinical presentations. Prompt recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis are imperative; however, both patients and healthcare professionals often fail to recognize and diagnose anaphylaxis in its early stages. Diagnostic criteria which take into account the variable clinical manifestations of anaphylaxis are now available and can assist healthcare providers in the early recognition of the condition. Immediate intramuscular administration of epinephrine into the anterolateral thigh is first-line therapy for anaphylaxis. Acute management may also involve oxygen therapy, intravenous fluids, and adjunctive therapies such as antihistamines or inhaled beta2-agonists. The mainstays of long-term management include specialist assessment, a prescription for an epinephrine auto-injector, patient and caregiver education on avoidance measures, and the provision of an individualized anaphylaxis action plan.



immunoglobulin E


non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs


angiotensin-converting enzyme


acetylsalicylic acid


number needed to treat


Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology


  1. Turner PJ, DunnGalvin A, Hourihane JO. The emperor has no symptoms: the risks of a blanket approach to using epinephrine autoinjectors for all allergic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(6):1143–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jerschow E, Lin RY, Scaperotti MM, McGinn AP. Fatal anaphylaxis in the United States 1999–2010: temporal patterns and demographic associations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(6):1318–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma LL, Danoff TM, Borish L. Case fatality and population mortality associated with anaphylaxis in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):1075–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M, Thong BY, Worm M, Tanno LK, Lockey RF, El-Gamal YM, Brown SG, Park HS, Sheikh A. 2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Randolph C, Oppenheimer J, Bernstein D, Bernstein J, Ellis A, Golden DB, Greenberger P, Kemp S, Khan D, Ledford D, Lieberman J, Metcalfe D, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Sicherer S, Wallace D, Blessing-Moore J, Lang D, Portnoy JM, Schuller D, Spector S, Tilles SA. Anaphylaxis—a practice parameter update 2015. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;115(5):341–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braganza SC, Acworth JP, McKinnon DR, Peake JE, Brown AF. Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown SGA. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown AF, McKinnon D, Chu K. Emergency department anaphylaxis: a review of 142 patients in a single year. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:861–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee S, Hess EP, Nestler DM, Athmaram VRB, Bellolio MF, Decker WW, Li JT, Hagan JB, Manivannan V, Vukov SC, Campbell RL. Antihypertensive medication use is associated with increased organ system involvement and hospitalization in emergency department patients with anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(4):1103–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb LM, Lieberman P. Anaphylaxis: a review of 601 cases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;97:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee S, Sadosty AT, Campbell RL. Update on biphasic anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16(4):346–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis AK, Day JH. Incidence and characteristics of biphasic anaphylaxis: a prospective evaluation of 103 patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007;98(1):64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, Schmitt C, Bass R, Chowdhury BA, Decker WW, Furlong TJ, Galli SJ, Golden DB, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD Jr, Hepner DL, Howarth M, Kaplan AP, Levy JH, Lewis LM, Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, Murphy R, Pollart SM, Pumphrey RS, Rosenwasser LJ, Simons FE, Wood JP, Camargo CA Jr. Symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115:584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, Brown SG, Camargo CA Jr, Cydulka R, Galli SJ, Gidudu J, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD Jr, Hepner DL, Lewis LM, Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, O’Connor R, Muraro A, Rudman A, Schmitt C, Scherrer D, Simons FE, Thomas S, Wood JP, Decker WW. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report—second national institute of allergy and infectious disease/food allergy and anaphylaxis network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis AK, Day JH. Diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis. CMAJ. 2003;169:307–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Waserman S, Chad Z, Francoeur MJ, Small P, Stark D, Vander Leek TK, Kaplan A, Kastner M. Management of anaphylaxis in primary care: Canadian expert consensus recommendations. Allergy. 2010;65:1082–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng A. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis in infants and children. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16(1):35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Simons FE, Roberts JR, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine absorption in children with a history of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101(1):33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simons FE, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine absorption in adults: intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(5):871–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pumphrey RS. Fatal posture in anaphylactic shock. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(2):451–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grunau BE, Wiens MO, Rowe BH, McKay R, Li J, Yi TW, Stenstrom R, Schellenberg RR, Grafstein E, Scheuermeyer FX. Emergency department corticosteroid use for allergy or anaphylaxis is not associated with decreased relapses. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;66(4):381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sicherer SH, Simons FE, Section on Allergy and Immunology, American Academy of Pediatrics. Self-injectable epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis. Pediatrics. 2007;119:638–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim L, Nevis IF, Tsai G, Dominic A, Potts R, Chiu J, Kim HL. Children under 15 kg with food allergy may be at risk of having epinephrine auto-injectors administered into bone. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014;10(1):40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai G, Kim L, Nevis IF, Dominic A, Potts R, Chiu J, Kim HL. Auto-injector needle length may be inadequate to deliver epinephrine intramuscularly in women with confirmed food allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014;10(1):39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith PK, Hourihane JO, Lieberman P. Risk multipliers for severe food anaphylaxis. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8(1):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Burks A. Peanut allergy. Lancet. 2008;371:1538–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Muraro A, Roberts G, Clark A, Eigenmann PA, Halken S, Lack G, Moneret-Vautrin A, Niggemann B, Rancé F, EAACI Task Force on Anaphylaxis in Children. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology. Allergy. 2007;62:857–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Anaphylaxis in schools & other settings. 3rd ed. Orleans: CSACI; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors’ contributions All authors wrote and/or edited sections of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This article is an update to the article entitled, Anaphylaxis, that originally appeared in the supplement, Practical Guide to Allergy and Immunology in Canada, which was published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology in 2011 (available at:

The authors would like to thank Julie Tasso for her editorial services and assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing interests

Dr. David Fischer is the President of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. He has received consulting fees and honoraria for continuing education from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Aralez, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Pediapharm and Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Dr. Timothy K. Vander Leek has participated in advisory boards and has received consulting fees and honoraria from Aralez, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Graceway Pharmaceuticals, King Pharma, Mead Johnson Nutrition, Merck, Paladin, Pediapharm, Pfizer, and Sanofi.

Dr. Harold Kim is Vice President of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Past President of the Canadian Network for Respiratory Care, and Co-chief Editor of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. He has received consulting fees and honoraria for continuing medical education from AstraZeneca, Aralez, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Kaleo, Merck, Novartis, Pediapharm, Sanofi, Shire and Teva.

Dr. Anne K. Ellis has participated in advisory boards for Circassia Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Novartis, and has been a speaker for AstraZeneca, Meda, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. Her institution has received research grants from Circassia Ltd, Green Cross Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Sun Pharma, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer. Dr. Ellis is also a former consultant to ALK-Abello Canada and Bayer Consumer Health Division.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the development of this review.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate are not applicable to this review article.


Publication of this supplement has been supported by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring Canada Inc., MEDA Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Merck Canada Inc., Pfizer Canada Inc., Shire Pharma Canada ULC, Stallergenes Greer Canada, Takeda Canada, Teva Canada Innovation, Aralez Tribute and Pediapharm.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology Volume 14 Supplement 2, 2018: Practical guide for allergy and immunology in Canada 2018. The full contents of the supplement are available online at

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, D., Vander Leek, T.K., Ellis, A.K. et al. Anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 14 (Suppl 2), 54 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: