Open Access

Adrenal suppression in children treated with swallowed fluticasone and oral viscous budesonide for eosinophilic esophagitis

  • Alexandra Ahmet1, 3, 4Email author,
  • Eric I. Benchimol2, 3, 4, 5,
  • Ellen B. Goldbloom1, 3, 4 and
  • Janice L. Barkey2, 3, 4
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology201612:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-016-0154-9

Received: 21 April 2016

Accepted: 22 September 2016

Published: 10 October 2016

Abstract

Background

Adrenal suppression (AS), a glucocorticoid (GC) side effect associated with significant morbidity, is well described related to inhaled corticosteroid therapy for asthma. Swallowed topical glucocorticoid therapy is the main pharmacotherapy treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and therefore children with EoE are potentially at increased risk of AS.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, we included children and youth <18 years diagnosed with EoE and treated with swallowed fluticasone or oral viscous budesonide for more than 1 month. First morning cortisol and low dose adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test (LDST) were performed 2 weeks following GC discontinuation. AS was defined as an abnormal LDST result (cortisol peak <500 nmol/L). We determined the prevalence and duration of AS related to swallowed topical GC therapy in EoE by LDST, as well as the diagnostic accuracy of first morning cortisol compared to LDST.

Results

Of 29 participants enrolled, 26 (89.7 %) received oral viscous budesonide and 3 (10.3 %) received swallowed fluticasone. Nineteen (65.5 %) participants had AS. Median duration of AS was 43 weeks. Five (17.2 %) participants had persistent AS at 12 months. There were no identifiable risk factors for the development of AS. First morning cortisol was highly specific but had poor sensitivity for detection of AS.

Conclusions

The majority of children with EoE had AS after discontinuation of swallowed topical GC therapy. Stress steroids should be considered in children treated with swallowed topical GC therapy for EoE, even after GC discontinuation, to prevent possible adrenal crisis.

Keywords

Adrenal suppressionChildrenCohort studiesCortisolDiagnostic testsEosinophilic esophagitisGlucocorticoidTreatment

Background

Adrenal suppression (AS), a potential side effect of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, is the most common form of secondary adrenal insufficiency [1]. Significant morbidity and mortality related to AS in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been well described in the asthma population [2, 3].

The swallowed portion of ICS that escapes first pass inactivation by the liver may lead to systemic side effects [4]. Swallowed fluticasone or viscous budesonide are the mainstays of pharmacotherapy in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) [5]. Children treated for EoE are therefore potentially at increased risk of AS and its associated morbidity. Guidelines exist for screening and management of potential AS in children treated with ICS for asthma [6]. However there are currently no guidelines addressing the risk in children receiving swallowed ICS for EoE.

AS occurs due to negative feedback inhibition when the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is exposed to exogenous GCs, resulting in decreased cortisol production [7]. Symptoms of AS are often non-specific and may go unrecognized until an adrenal crisis is precipitated by physiologic stress such as illness, surgery, injury, or anesthesia [1]. Adrenal crisis presents as hypotension, hypoglycemia, shock, decreased consciousness, seizure or even death [7] and has been well described related to GC therapy for asthma and malignancy in children [2, 8]. AS can persist for months to years following discontinuation of GC therapy [9, 10]. Prevention of adrenal crisis requires recognition of AS and administration of GCs during times of physiological stress [1].

We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine the prevalence and duration of AS in children with EoE. In addition, we determined whether first morning cortisol was a sensitive and specific screening test for AS in the population, or whether a low dose ACTH stimulation test (LDST) was necessary to make the diagnosis. We also sought to determine risk factors for the development of AS, and the diagnostic accuracy of first morning cortisol as a screening tool for the diagnosis of AS in children with EoE.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in the EoE clinic at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Canada.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO REB Protocol No: 11/181X). Informed consent/assent was obtained, as appropriate.

Participants

We included children and youth <18 years diagnosed with EoE treated with swallowed fluticasone or oral viscous budesonide for more than 1 month, over a 2 year period from 2011 to 2013. All included participants were diagnosed as per standard clinical and histological criteria [5]. They were refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, and were symptomatic with dysphagia, abdominal pain, heartburn, or other symptoms consistent with EoE. All included participants had biopsy-proven EoE, defined as >15 eosinophils per high-powered field (hpf) from mucosal biopsies in any region of the esophagus obtained during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Participants were followed for a minimum of 12 months or until August 2014 and were excluded if they had known adrenal insufficiency unrelated to GC therapy including ACTH deficiency due to hypothalamic or pituitary gland abnormalities, or a primary adrenal disorder. Participants who had received continuous oral or intravenous GC therapy for more than 2 weeks during the 6 month period preceding study enrollment were also excluded. The treatment protocol evaluated in our study represented a new standard of care for our EoE clinic and therefore all patients meeting the above criteria were enrolled consecutively.

Treatment protocol

Participants were treated with oral viscous budesonide 1 mg (for children <5 feet tall) or 2 mg (for children/youth ≥5 feet tall) mixed with Splenda® to form a viscous suspension (approximately 0.5 mg/2 mL) [11]. If they declined viscous budesonide, they were offered therapy with swallowed fluticasone. Fluticasone dose was 125 mcg/puff (for children <5 feet tall) or 250 mcg/puff (for children/youth ≥5 feet tall), swallowed once daily. Treatment at full dose was continued for 3 months, and then tapered by giving the same dose every other day for 1 month, followed by discontinuation of the swallowed topical GC therapy.

As part of our standard clinical practice guidelines, all patients diagnosed with AS are instructed to administer stress doses of GCs until resolution of AS (normalization of the LDST). Management of AS is outlined in Appendix Table 3.

Assessment of adrenal axis functioning

A first morning cortisol level (drawn between 08:00 and 09:00) and LDST were arranged for 2 weeks (±3 days) following the final swallowed topical GC dose. First morning cortisol levels and LDST were performed in the Medical Day Unit at CHEO. If abnormal on initial testing, LDST was repeated 2 months following discontinuation of swallowed topical GC therapy, and every 3 months thereafter until resolution of AS (normalization of LDST). The duration of AS was defined as the time from the initial abnormal LDST to normalization of the LDST (>500 nmol/L).

Laboratory investigations

Serum cortisol levels were measured by competitive binding immunoenzymatic assay (Beckman Coulter). First morning cortisol levels were measured in the serum on samples obtained between 08:00 and 09:00. A cortisol value of >185 nmol/L was considered to be normal; this normal value corresponds to our hospital biochemistry laboratory normal range for morning cortisol.

To perform the LDST, a peripheral intravenous line was established and 1 mcg of IV cosyntropin was administered (Cortrosyn, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc.). Sampling of serum cortisol levels was done at 15, 30 and 60 min after cosyntropin administration. A normal LDST result was defined as a cortisol level peak >500 nmol/L [12, 13]. AS was defined as an abnormal LDST (cortisol peak <500 nmol/L) [12, 13].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated and reported as medians with interquartile range (IQR) or means with standard deviation (SD) where appropriate. Diagnostic accuracy of first morning cortisol was reported compared to the reference standard LDST (using 500 nmol/L as the cutoff value) by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Agreement between first morning cortisol and LDST to identify those with AS was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa statistic (±standard error). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the best cutoff of first morning cortisol to differentiate those with normal and abnormal LDST. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

Baseline characteristics

Characteristics of enrolled participants are outlined in Table 1. Thirty-three patients met the study inclusion criteria and consented to enrollment; 29 patients were enrolled (Fig. 1). Of the 29 study participants, 26 (89.7 %) were treated with oral viscous budesonide, and three (10.3 %) were treated with swallowed fluticasone. Thirteen participants (44.8 %) were receiving other forms of GCs (Table 1). None of the additional forms of GCs were systemic.
Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of study cohort

Characteristic

 

Total number of patients analyzed

29

Female, N (%)

7 (24.1)

Median age (y) at diagnosis with EoE (IQR)

13.2 (6.4)

Median age (y) at study enrollment (IQR)

14.1 (4.6)

Features of GC therapy

 Duration of GC therapy (days ± SD)

104.6 ± 23.7

 Oral viscous budesonide, N (%)

26 (89.7)

 Swallowed fluticasone, N (%)

3 (10.3)

Concomitant conditions, N (%)

 Asthma

21 (72.4)

 Allergiesa

27 (93.1)

 Eczema

10 (34.5)

Additional forms of GC therapy, by patient, N (%)

 Total number of patients receiving additional forms

13 (44.8 %)

 Inhaled corticosteroidsb

11 (37.9 %)

 Intranasal

1 (3.4 %)

 Topical

2 (6.9 %)

EoE eosinophilic esophagitis, ICS inhaled corticosteroids, IQR interquartile range, GC glucocorticoid, N number, SD standard deviation, y years

aA diagnosis of allergy was made based on skin prick testing for food and/or environmental allergies by an allergist

bMost participants had a history of infrequent ICS use during inter-current infection only. Two participants were being actively treated with daily moderate ICS doses (Flovent 250 mcg daily and Alvesco 400 mcg daily)

Fig. 1

Study flow diagram

Initial testing for adrenal suppression

Two weeks following discontinuation of GC therapy, 19 (65.5 %) participants were found to have AS, as defined by a LDST peak <500 nmol/L on initial testing (Fig. 2). Of those, 11 of 19 (57.9 %) had a borderline LDST result (peak cortisol 450–499 nmol/L), and 8 of 19 (42.1 %) had a LDST peak <450 nmol/L (Fig. 1). All but one of the participants with AS were treated with budesonide. On exploratory univariate analysis, there were no significant predictors of AS, including concomitant ICS use (Table 2).
Fig. 2

Peak cortisol level on ACTH stimulation test in adrenal suppression (AS) vs no adrenal suppression (NO AS) group

Table 2

Potential predictors of adrenal suppression

 

No AS

AS

p value

Female sex (N,  %)

3/10 (30 %)

4/19 (21.1 %)

0.66a

Age (median, IQR)

15.15 (4.75)

13.81 (4.66)

0.31b

Duration of GC therapy (days)

113.5 ± 30.44

99.8 ± 18.44

0.22c

BMI

18.2 ± 2.54

19.3 ± 3.15

0.33c

Concurrent use of ICS therapy (intermittent or continuous)

2/10 (20 %)

9/19 (47.3 %)

0.23a

Concurrent use of ICS therapy (continuous only)

1/10 (10 %)

5/19 (26.3 %)

0.63a

AS adrenal suppression, BMI body mass index, GC glucocorticoid, ICS inhaled corticosteroids, IQR interquartile range, N number

aFisher’s Exact test

bWilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test

cT test (equal variances not assumed)

Five of the 19 participants (26.3 %) with confirmed AS had an abnormal first morning cortisol (<185 nmol/L) (Fig. 3). There was only slight agreement between first morning cortisol and LDST to define AS (Kappa 0.198 ± 0.09, P = 0.092). The diagnostic accuracy of abnormal first morning cortisol (<185 nmol/L) to identify AS (defined by an abnormal LDST) was as follows: sensitivity 26.3 % (95 % CI 45.7–81.4 %), specificity 100 % (95 % CI 65.5–100 %), PPV 100 % (95 % CI 46.3–100 %), NPV 37.5 % (95 % CI 19.6–59.2 %), LR+ infinite, LR− 0.75 (95 % CI 0.58–0.97). As defined by the ROC curve, the best cutoff of first morning cortisol to define AS was 323 nmol/L, which differentiated AS participants from those without AS with sensitivity 70.0 % (95 % CI 45.7–87.2 %), specificity 77.8 % (95 % CI 40.2–96.1 %), PPV 87.5 % (95 % CI 60.4–97.8 %), NPV 53.8 % (95 % CI 26.1–79.6 %), LR+ 3.15 (95 % CI 0.90–11.05), LR− 0.39 (95 % CI 0.19–0.80).
Fig. 3

First morning cortisol value in adrenal suppression (AS) vs no adrenal suppression (NO AS) group

Longitudinal testing for sustained adrenal suppression

Median duration of AS was 42.7 (IQR 11.1–60.6) weeks. AS lasted >365 days in at least 5 of 19 (26.3 %) participants; all of which had a LDST peak <450 nmol/L. Details of longitudinal testing are depicted in Fig. 1. There were no reported cases of adrenal crisis during the study period.

Availability of data and materials

An additional Excel file shows the dataset on which the conclusions of the manuscript rely (Additional file 1).

Discussion

The findings of our study demonstrate that children are at significant risk of prolonged AS following treatment with swallowed topical glucocorticoids for the treatment of EoE. Almost two-thirds of the children in our study had AS 2 weeks following treatment with a median duration of 42 weeks; several had persistent AS beyond 1 year. Our prospective study provides an important contribution to our understanding of AS in the EoE population, demonstrating that this potential side effect is not only a concern while on treatment, but continues following discontinuation of swallowed glucocorticoid therapy. In addition, we demonstrated that first morning cortisol was not a sensitive test for AS when compared with the LDST.

Previous studies examining AS in children treated with swallowed topical GC have resulted in mixed conclusions. A national surveillance study of symptomatic AS from any form of GC reported that 2 of 46 children were treated with swallowed topical GC, suggesting that the EoE population might be at increased risk [14]. A recent retrospective study also suggested that children who were being actively treated with swallowed budesonide for EoE were at increased risk of AS [15]. Our study confirmed these warnings. In contrast to the previous study [15], we tested 2 weeks after discontinuation of topical GC therapy to rule out acute transient AS that would be expected while receiving GC therapy.

Our findings differed from a recent prospective study that examined 14 children receiving swallowed topical GCs concluding that there was no significant effect on the adrenal axis [16]; the conflicting results were likely secondary to the testing modality chosen to define AS. Morning cortisol was used to evaluate the HPA axis [15]; we demonstrated that this test has very poor sensitivity for AS indicating that dynamic testing should be considered instead.

Our findings suggest that an abnormal first morning cortisol (<185 nmol/L) is highly specific for adrenal suppression in the EoE population treated with swallowed topical GC therapy but that sensitivity is poor. The cutoff of 185 nmol/L is significantly higher than cutoffs previously reported in the literature [1719] and likely reflects a higher pre-test probability of AS in the EoE population. While it is important for clinicians to be aware that cortisol thresholds vary slightly between platforms and cannot be directly compared, it is unlikely that this accounts for our results [18, 20]. Our findings are consistent with previous studies in other populations, suggesting that the LDST with sensitivity and specificity around 90 % [12, 21], is required in the evaluation of AS unless first morning cortisol values are very high or very low [19, 22].

Potential systemic side effects of ICS, including AS, occur when the swallowed portion escapes inactivation by first-pass metabolism in the liver and enters the systemic circulation [4]. A recent study in adults with EoE concluded that active disease may result in reduced elimination of budesonide via CYP3A, compared to healthy adults, suggesting a possible increased risk of AS in the EoE population [23].

Adrenal crisis during surgery and illness in patients with adrenal insufficiency who have not received stress doses of GC therapy is well documented [2, 8]. General anesthesia is also a potential stressor and is a consideration in patients with EoE undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. A recent CSACI position statement provides an approach to screening and management of potential AS in children treated with ICS for asthma [6]. Our study suggests that clinicians should be aware of the potential for AS in all children being treated with swallowed topical corticosteroids and consider GC stress dosing for significant physiological stress until significant abnormalities on LDST are ruled out. If there are unexplained non-specific symptoms (i.e. fatigue, malaise, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, headache) or poor growth, then testing of the HPA axis and consultation with a pediatric endocrinologist should be sought. In addition, a pediatric endocrinologist should be consulted for individuals with prolonged AS based on LDST.

A possible limitation of our study is the absence of LDST prior to initiation of swallowed topical GC therapy. Almost half of the study population received other forms of GC therapy for treatment of asthma, eczema and allergic rhinitis; yet none were receiving regular high doses of ICS. Fifty three percent of children with AS in our study did not receive concomitant GC therapy, demonstrating that swallowed topical GCs can cause AS independently. Although concomitant GC use was not demonstrated to be a risk factor for AS, our study may not have been powered to detect this. The use of the lowest effective doses of all forms of GC may help in the prevention of AS [3].

This study was limited by the small number of enrolled participants; the univariate analysis of risk factors for AS was exploratory only as our study may not have been powered to detect predictors. While 27.6 % of our children had significantly abnormal LDST results, 57 % of children in the AS group had a “borderline” cortisol peak on LDST (450–499 nmol/L), the clinical significance of which is difficult to interpret. To our knowledge, there is no literature that has examined the risk of symptomatic AS in individuals with mildly abnormal LDST. As such, all participants with documented AS were treated with stress doses of GC therapy for illness, surgery or injury as per standard of care [1].

In conclusion, almost two-thirds of the children/youth in our EoE cohort had evidence of AS detected by LDST following discontinuation of swallowed topical GC therapy. Twenty seven percent of the subjects demonstrated significant abnormalities on testing, indicating that AS is a true concern in EoE. When present, AS was persistent and prolonged. Unrecognized AS can lead to adrenal crisis with significant morbidity and even mortality [1, 2]. We recommend consideration of GC stress dosing during significant physiological stress (moderate to severe illness or injury, general anesthesia or surgery) in children/youth being treated with swallowed topical GC for EoE both during and after discontinuation of their swallowed topical GC therapy and until significant abnormalities on LDST are ruled out. Borderline results on LDST need to be evaluated on an individual basis; future study addressing the risk in these patients is needed. This study highlights the essential need for further education of EoE patients, families and the health care team about the symptoms of AS and the management of illness in the context of AS.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AA conceptualized the study, developed the protocol for AS screening in the GI clinic, drafted the initial manuscript and revised the manuscript with input from the rest of co-authors. EIB designed the data collection instruments, carried out the statistical analysis, reviewed and revised the manuscript. EBG reviewed and revised the manuscript. JLB collected the data, reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors participated equally in the study design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chantal Shouldice, RN and Louise Lenz, RN who helped with patient recruitment and data collection. We appreciate the efforts of Pauline Quach and Danielle Birman who assisted with the study coordination. We also appreciate the assistance of Victor Konji with the manuscript and reference formatting.

Competing interests

AA has received honorariums from Takeda Canada for involvement in CME activities, and also from Reveragen for consulting activities. Neither Takeda Canada nor Reveragen had any involvement in the data or material presented or any other aspect of this study. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and material

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article and its additional files.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO REB Protocol No: 11/181X). Informed consent/assent was obtained, as appropriate.

Funding and support

EIB was supported by a Career Development Award from the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program and a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. None of these agencies had any involvement in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing this manuscript.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Endocrinology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
(2)
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario
(3)
Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute
(4)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa
(5)
School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa

References

  1. Shulman DI, Palmert MR, Kemp SF. Adrenal insufficiency: still a cause of morbidity and death in childhood. Pediatrics. 2007;119(2):e484–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Todd GR, Acerini CL, Buck JJ, Murphy NP, Ross-Russell R, Warner JT, et al. Acute adrenal crisis in asthmatics treated with high-dose fluticasone propionate. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(6):1207–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmet A, Kim H, Spier S. Adrenal suppression: a practical guide to the screening and management of this under-recognized complication of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2011;7:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Martin RJ, Szefler SJ, Chinchilli VM, Kraft M, Dolovich M, Boushey HA, et al. Systemic effect comparisons of six inhaled corticosteroid preparations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(10):1377–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, Atkins D, Attwood SE, Bonis PA, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(1):3–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Issa-El-Khoury K, Kim H, Chan ES, Vander Leek T, Noya F. CSACI position statement: systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroids on adrenal suppression in the management of pediatric asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015;11(1):9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller W, Achermann J, Frankland AW. The adrenal cortex and its disorders. In: Sperling M, editor. Pediatric endocrinology, vol. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 444–511.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rix M, Birkebaek NH, Rosthoj S, Clausen N. Clinical impact of corticosteroid-induced adrenal suppression during treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: a prospective observational study using the low-dose adrenocorticotropin test. J Pediatr. 2005;147(5):645–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Huber BM, Bolt IB, Sauvain MJ, Fluck CE. Adrenal insufficiency after glucocorticoid withdrawal in children with rheumatic diseases. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(12):1889–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wildi-Runge S, Deladoey J, Belanger C, Deal CL, Van Vliet G, Alos N, et al. A search for variables predicting cortisol response to low-dose corticotropin stimulation following supraphysiological doses of glucocorticoids. J Pediatr. 2013;163(2):484–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dohil R, Newbury R, Fox L, Bastian J, Aceves S. Oral viscous budesonide is effective in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(2):418–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Agwu JC, Spoudeas H, Hindmarsh PC, Pringle PJ, Brook CG. Tests of adrenal insufficiency. Arch Dis Child. 1999;80(4):330–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tordjman K, Jaffe A, Trostanetsky Y, Greenman Y, Limor R, Stern N. Low-dose (1 microgram) adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) stimulation as a screening test for impaired hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis function: sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in comparison with the high-dose (250 microgram) test. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000;52(5):633–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldbloom EB, Mokashi A, Cummings E, Huynh H, Benseler S, Watson W, et al. Adrenal suppression in the pediatric population in Canada. Canadian Pediatric Society Annual Meeting, Volume 19. Montreal, Quebec: Paediatr Child Health; 2014.Google Scholar
  15. Harel S, Hursh BE, Chan ES, Avinashi V, Panagiotopoulos C. Adrenal suppression in children treated with oral viscous budesonide for eosinophilic esophagitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(2):190–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Philla KQ, Min SB, Hefner JN, Howard RS, Reinhardt BJ, Nazareno LG, et al. Swallowed glucocorticoid therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis in children does not suppress adrenal function. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28(9–10):1101–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maguire AM, Biesheuvel CJ, Ambler GR, Moore B, McLean M, Cowell CT. Evaluation of adrenal function using the human corticotrophin-releasing hormone test, low dose Synacthen test and 9am cortisol level in children and adolescents with central adrenal insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(5):683–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kazlauskaite R, Evans AT, Villabona CV, Abdu TA, Ambrosi B, Atkinson AB, et al. Corticotropin tests for hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal insufficiency: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endoclinol Metab. 2008;93(11):4245–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Kazlauskaite R, Maghnie M. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of central adrenal insufficiency in children. Endocr Dev. 2010;17:96–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruson D, Lepoutre T, Galanti L. Comparison of four immunoassays for measurement of cortisol levels. Endocr Abstr. 2012;29:P106.Google Scholar
  21. Weintrob N, Sprecher E, Josefsberg Z, Weininger C, Aurbach-Klipper Y, Lazard D, et al. Standard and low-dose short adrenocorticotropin test compared with insulin-induced hypoglycemia for assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children with idiopathic multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1998;83(1):88–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Roux CW, Meeran K, Alaghband-Zadeh J. Is a 0900-h serum cortisol useful prior to a short synacthen test in outpatient assessment? Ann Clin Biochem. 2002;39(Pt 2):148–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dilger K, Lopez-Lazaro L, Marx C, Bussmann C, Straumann A. Active eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with impaired elimination of budesonide by cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. Digestion. 2013;87(2):110–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement