Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transcutaneous penetration of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) compared to a full-size antibody: potential tool for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology volume 17, Article number: 73 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Currently, several biologics are used for the treatment of cutaneous pathologies such as atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis or skin cancers. The main administration routes are subcutaneous and intravenous injections. However, little is known about antibody penetration through the skin. The aim was to study the transcutaneous penetration of a reduced-size antibody as a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) compared to a whole antibody (Ab) and to determine its capacity to neutralize an inflammatory cytokine involved in AD such as human interleukin-4 (hIL-4). Transcutaneous penetration was evaluated by ex vivo studies on tape-stripped pig ear skin. ScFv and Ab visualization through the skin was measured by Raman microspectroscopy. In addition, hIL-4 neutralization was studied in vitro using HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells and normal human keratinocytes (NHKs). After 24 h of application, analysis by Raman microspectroscopy showed that scFv penetrated into the upper dermis while Ab remained on the stratum corneum. In addition, the anti-hIL4 scFv showed very efficient and dose-dependent hIL-4 neutralization. Thus, scFv penetrates through to the upper papillary dermis while Ab mostly remains on the surface, the anti-hIL4 scFv also neutralizes its target effectively suggesting its potential use as topical therapy for AD.

Introduction

Currently, immunotherapy is used for the treatment of several skin pathologies such as atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis (PSO) and cancers, mainly via subcutaneous or intravenous routes. Finding new antibody delivery methods is a challenge and different technologies have emerged in recent years such as microneedle patches, nanoparticles, liposomes or gel formulations [1]. In addition, several modified antibodies are under development to treat cutaneous diseases, but at present, only certolizumab pegol, a PEGylated anti-tumor necrosis factor α antigen-binding fragment (Fab) has been approved (2013) for the treatment of PSO [1]. AD is an inflammatory skin disease with a high and constantly increasing prevalence worldwide (1–3% of adults and 15–20% of children) [2]. This pathology is characterized by a skin barrier default and a Th2 phenotype with secretion of several proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5 and IL-13. Among them, IL-4 is particularly involved in immunoglobulin (Ig) class switching to IgE [3]. Different cell populations express the high affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) and immune complex phagocytosis by these cells leads to T lymphocytes activation [4]. Until now, only one immunotherapy treatment targeting the IL-4/IL-13 common receptor, IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα), has been approved for AD. Thus, developing a new topical immunotherapy treatment is a real challenge that would improve patients quality of life.

At present, there is no evidence in the literature proving that a reduced-size antibody could penetrate the skin more easily than a whole antibody. Thus, the first aim was to compare the passage of a single chain variable fragment (scFv) (~ 25 kDa) through a damaged skin, mimicking the poor barrier function of atopic skin, compared to a full-size monoclonal antibody (Ab) (~ 150 kDa). In addition, we addressed whether a scFv could neutralize the effects of human IL-4 (hIL-4) after stimulation of normal human keratinocytes (NHKs).

Methods

For the comparative study of the transcutaneous penetration of whole antibody and scFv, ex vivo experiments were performed on pig ear skin. After shaving, ears were tape-stripped 25 times (Clinical&Derm, USA) to obtain the altered skin condition. Then, 8 mm diameter punches were treated with 5 µl phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Corning, USA), and 11 µM anti-CD44 scFv (Creative Biolabs, USA) or anti-CD44 Ab (Thermofisher Scientific, USA). Skin samples were placed at 37 °C for 6 h or 24 h and cryopreserved until Raman microspectroscopy analysis.

Three 14 µm thick sections were used per sample and three Raman acquisitions were read for each section totaling nine measures per sample. Briefly, Raman images were obtained using a confocal Raman microspectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, France) operating with a 660 nm laser. Labspec 6 software (Horiba Jobin Yvon, France) was used for acquisition and data pre-processing. Raman maps were recorded in an area of X: 10-µm/Y: 150-µm with 5 µm step size in the XY directions. Raman spectra were acquired in the 400–2300 cm−1 spectral range. To prevent background noise, Raman spectra were smoothed using a 2nd order Savitzky-Golay type filter, baseline corrected using a 7th order polynomial function, and spectra with an intensity under 400 cts in the 1530–1730 cm−1 range were suppressed. Next, Raman spectra were cropped to keep only the 400–785 cm−1 range of interest, which was used for vector normalization. Finally, fitting (unmixing) by classical least squares with a non-negativity constraint (NCLS) was used to estimate the contribution of the various skin components leading to the images reflecting the distribution of the specific scFv or Ab through the skin cryo-sections.

To assess the neutralizing capacity of anti-hIL4 scFv in vitro, we used both a cell line model (HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells; InvivoGen, France) and NHKs as primary cells. HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells were cultured according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 50,000 cells were seeded in 96-well plates. Then, cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml hIL-4 (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) and treated with anti-hIL4 scFv (Creative Biolabs, USA) or Ab (Biotechne, USA) at different concentrations. The variable domains of the anti-hIL4 scFv and monoclonal Ab are distincts and the latter was used as a positive control. After 24 h, QUANTI-Blue™ substrate was added to supernatants. After 2h30 at 37 °C, SEAP levels were measured at 620 nm using a spectrophotometer.

NHKs were isolated from human skin samples from healthy donors (n = 4) undergoing medical surgery. The skin was collected after written informed consent from the donors and institutional approval. NHKs were stimulated with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) (2 µg/ml, Sigma, USA) ± hIL-4 (25 ng/ml, Peprotech, USA) and treated with anti-hIL4 scFv at different concentrations. After 24 h, supernatants were harvested to evaluate hIL-8 secretion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, USA). Cell protein concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermofisher Scientific, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. hIL-8 secretion was normalized to total protein amounts.

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism GraphPad software (GraphPad Software, USA). Significant differences between samples and control were evaluated by Student’s t-test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Some detailed protocols are available in the Supporting Information.

Results

First, we used Raman microspectroscopy to assess the transcutaneous penetration of antibody formats using pig ear skin. Three distinct peaks from the skin signal, corresponding to the scFv and Ab specific Raman signatures, were identified in the spectral range between 400 and 785 cm−1 (Fig. 1a). This first analysis was necessary to visualize antibody penetration through the skin. At 6 h, both scFv and Ab were only observed in the stratum corneum (depth: 10–20 µm) (Fig. 1b). At 24 h, scFv penetrated to a depth of 130 µm, corresponding to the upper papillary dermis while Ab remained on the surface (Fig. 1c). Results were obtained on altered skin samples. Hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) of pig ear skin showed an altered skin barrier function on tape-stripped samples due to removal of part of the stratum corneum (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visualization of transcutaneous antibody penetration by Raman microspectroscopy. a Single-chain variable fragment (scFv) and antibody (Ab) Raman signals (highlighted in pink) and skin Raman signals at different depths between 400 and 785 cm−1. b Quantification of scFv and Ab in damaged skin after 6 h or (c) 24 h of treatment

Full size image

Next, in vitro experiments were performed to assess the neutralizing capacity of anti-hIL4 scFv in HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells. Both the anti-hIL4 scFv and Ab showed significant dose-dependent neutralization of hIL-4 in the HEK Blue 2D model (Fig. 2a). In addition, at the maximal concentration of 200 nM, scFv neutralized an average of 68% of hIL-4 (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Human interleukin 4 (hIL-4) neutralization by single-chain variable fragment (scFv) on 2D models. a hIL-4 neutralization by scFv and Ab on HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells. Optical densities at 620 nm (OD 620 nm) were determined and results were expressed in arbitrary units after normalization to the maximum value (100%) measured in cells stimulated with 10 ng/ml hIL-4. In each experiment and for each condition, cells were seeded in triplicates (n = 4 for 1, 10 and 10 nM doses; n = 3 for 200 nM dose). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. b Human interleukin 8 (hIL-8) quantification in supernatants of normal human keratinocytes (NHKs) stimulated with hIL-4 ± polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) (25 ng/ml and 2 µg/ml, respectively) and treated with anti-hIL4 scFv at different concentrations for 24 h (n = 4). For the four donors, experiments were performed in duplicates. Results are normalized in relation to the quantity of total proteins per well and expressed as mean ± SEM (NS non-significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001)

Full size image

NHKs were then stimulated to evaluate hIL-4 neutralization by scFv on primary cells. hIL-8 dosage of supernatants from NHKs stimulated with hIL-4 ± poly I:C and treated with anti-hIL4 scFv, revealed a scFv dose-dependent decrease in four different donors (Fig. 2b). At 100, 200, 400 and 600 nM doses, a significant decrease in hIL-8 secretion was observed. ScFv neutralization ability against hIL-4 was calculated based on poly I:C induction of hIL-8. The hIL-4 + poly I:C was considered as the 0% of hIL-4 neutralization value, whereas poly I:C alone was considered as the 100% value (Table 1). At 600 nM scFv, the average percentage of hIL-4 neutralization reached 80%. Of note, the anti-hIL4 Ab used in this study showed low neutralization efficiency in this 2D model (data not shown).

Table 1 hIL-4 neutralization by scFv in normal human keratinocytes (expressed as a relative percentage to poly I:C)
Full size table

Discussion

Until now, few studies assessing antibody penetration in the skin have been carried out. Among them, topical application of infliximab, an anti-TNFα Ab, has been described in patients with ulcers [5], and Flightless I (Flii) neutralizing antibodies (FnAb) have been applied in a murine model of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita [6, 7]. No comparative study examining the penetration of reduced-size versus whole antibodies has yet been performed, especially using Raman microspectroscopy, which is a relevant tool for antibody characterization. Indeed, this technique can be used to monitor post-translational modifications, degradation or aggregation [8,9,10]. For several years, it has also been used to study the skin [11, 12]. To our knowledge, we are the first to track antibody passage through the skin using Raman microspectroscopy. Here, we showed in an ex vivo model of damaged skin that reduced size facilitated antibody penetration into the upper papillary dermis.

Only one antibody fragment has been approved for the treatment of skin pathologies. Recently, M1095, an anti-IL17A/F nanobody completed a phase 1 clinical trial for the treatment of moderate to severe PSO [13]. Thus, antibody fragments could be potential tools for the development of new topical treatments for cutaneous diseases. Indeed, in recent years, innovative immunotherapy methods have emerged including microneedles, nanoparticles or liposomes [14,15,16,17]. To date, only one immunotherapy treatment has been approved for AD. Several treatments targeting proinflammatory molecules including cytokines and their receptors are under development for AD management [18]. First, we chose to target hIL-4, which is a key cytokine involved in AD physiopathology. In fact, it leads to B-lymphocytes class switching to IgE and naïve T cells differentiation into Th2 [19]. Therefore, we decided to focus on the effect of hIL-4 neutralization on inflammatory human keratinocytes. We found a scFv dose-dependent decrease in hIL-8 secretion suggesting a key role for hIL-4 in inflammation. In addition, our results showed a strong neutralization efficiency of anti-hIL4 scFv on HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells.

A limitation of our ex vivo model could be the lack of lesional AD human skin biopsies. Tape strips represent a simple and easy way to mimic barrier disruption, feature observed in the pathology. Nevertheless, this alteration does not reflect all structural changes of atopic skin, suggesting a different behavior of scFv penetration on patient’s skin that would need to be assessed. In the future, it would be interesting to evaluate the benefits of a topical anti-mouse IL-4 treatment on an in vivo AD model such as NC/Nga mice [20].

To sum up, we showed that reduced-size antibodies depict better penetration abilities than full-size antibodies and retain high capacity to neutralize a cytokine target. Reduced-size antibodies could be therefore potential relevant topical treatments for inflammatory skin diseases as AD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Baylet A, Laclaverie M, Marchand L, Bordes S, Closs-Gonthier B, Delpy L. Immunotherapies in cutaneous pathologies: an overview. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):248–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(1):8–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mu Z, Zhao Y, Liu X, Chang C, Zhang J. Molecular biology of atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014;47(2):193–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu F-T, Goodarzi H, Chen H-Y. IgE, mast cells, and eosinophils in atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;41(3):298–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Streit M, Beleznay Z, Braathen LR. Topical application of the tumour necrosis factor-α antibody infliximab improves healing of chronic wounds. Int Wound J. 2006;3(3):171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kopecki Z, Ruzehaji N, Turner C, Iwata H, Ludwig RJ, Zillikens D, et al. Topically applied flightless I neutralizing antibodies improve healing of blistered skin in a murine model of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(4):1008–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haidari H, Zhang Q, Melville E, Kopecki Z, Song Y, Cowin AJ, et al. Development of topical delivery systems for flightless neutralizing antibody. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(7):1795–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McAvan BS, Bowsher LA, Powell T, O’Hara JF, Spitali M, Goodacre R, et al. Raman spectroscopy to monitor post-translational modifications and degradation in monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Anal Chem. 2020;92(15):10381–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sane SU, Wong R, Hsu CC. Raman spectroscopic characterization of drying-induced structural changes in a therapeutic antibody: correlating structural changes with long-term stability. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(4):1005–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ettah I, Ashton L. Engaging with Raman spectroscopy to investigate antibody aggregation. Antibodies. 2018;7(3):24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gniadecka M, Nielsen OF, Christensen DH, Wulf HC. Structure of water, proteins, and lipids in intact human skin, hair, and nail. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;110(4):393–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barry BW, Edwards HGM, Williams AC. Fourier transform Raman and infrared vibrational study of human skin: assignment of spectral bands. J Raman Spectrosc. 1992;23(11):641–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Svecova D. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study of multiple ascending doses of subcutaneous M1095, an anti-interleukin 17A/F nanobody, in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(1):8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Ye Y, Hochu GM, Sadeghifar H, Gu Z. Enhanced cancer immunotherapy by microneedle patch-assisted delivery of anti-PD1 antibody. Nano Lett. 2016;16(4):2334–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferreira M, Barreiros L, Segundo MA, Torres T, Selores M, Costa Lima SA, et al. Topical co-delivery of methotrexate and etanercept using lipid nanoparticles: a targeted approach for psoriasis management. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;159:23–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Petrilli R, Eloy J, Lopez R, Lee R. Cetuximab immunoliposomes enhance delivery of 5-FU to skin squamous carcinoma cells. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2017;17(2):301–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen X, Zhang Z, Yang S, Chen H, Wang D, Li J. All-trans retinoic acid-encapsulated, CD20 antibody-conjugated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles effectively target and eliminate melanoma-initiating cells in vitro. OncoTargets Ther. 2018;11:6177–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luger T, Dirschka T, Eyerich K, Gollnick H, Gupta G, Lambert J, et al. Developments and challenges in dermatology: an update from the Interactive Derma Academy (IDeA) 2019. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(S7):3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guttman-Yassky E, Bissonnette R, Ungar B, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ardeleanu M, Esaki H, et al. Dupilumab progressively improves systemic and cutaneous abnormalities in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(1):155–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim Y-J, Choi MJ, Bak D-H, Lee BC, Ko EJ, Ahn GR, et al. Topical administration of EGF suppresses immune response and protects skin barrier in DNCB-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the members of the UMR CNRS 7276-INSERM U 1262 research unit for helpful discussions and comments and Jeanne Cook-Moreau for proofreading of the manuscript. We would also like to thank all the members of Silab R&D and more specifically Nathalie Solingeas and Elodie Brugère for their technical expertise.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Silab R&D. A.B. was a recipient of a Ph.D. CIFRE-ANRT fellowship from the French government.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Brigitte Closs-Gonthier and Laurent Delpy contributed equally to the work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unité Mixte de Recherche CNRS, 7276-INSERM U1262-Université de Limoges, CBRS, 2 rue du Dr Marcland, 87025, Limoges, France

    Audrey Baylet & Laurent Delpy

  2. Silab R&D Department, Brive, France

    Audrey Baylet, Raoul Vyumvuhore, Marine Laclaverie, Laëtitia Marchand, Carine Mainzer, Sylvie Bordes & Brigitte Closs-Gonthier

Authors
  1. Audrey Baylet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raoul Vyumvuhore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marine Laclaverie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laëtitia Marchand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carine Mainzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sylvie Bordes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brigitte Closs-Gonthier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Laurent Delpy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AB performed experiments and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. RV analyzed and interpreted Raman spectroscopy. ML, LM, CM, SB, BCG and LD supervised the study and and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Delpy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Normal human keratinocytes (NHKs) were isolated from human skin samples from healthy donors undergoing medical surgery. The skin was collected after written informed consent from the donors and institutional approval.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1. Representative images for hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) of pig ear skin samples (a) with no treatment or (b) times tape-stripped to mimic damaged skin. Table S1: hIL-4 neutralization by scFv in HEK-Blue™ IL-4/IL-13 cells (expressed as a relative percentage to OD620 nm).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baylet, A., Vyumvuhore, R., Laclaverie, M. et al. Transcutaneous penetration of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) compared to a full-size antibody: potential tool for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 17, 73 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00574-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00574-x

Keywords

Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology

ISSN: 1710-1492

Contact us