Skip to content


Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology

Open Access

A detailed phenotypic analysis of immune cell populations in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of atopic asthmatics after segmental allergen challenge

  • Jonathan S Boomer1,
  • Amit D Parulekar1, 2,
  • Brenda M Patterson1,
  • Huiqing Yin-Declue1,
  • Christine M Deppong1,
  • Seth Crockford1,
  • Nizar N Jarjour3,
  • Mario Castro1 and
  • Jonathan M Green1Email author
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology20139:37

Received: 25 July 2013

Accepted: 8 September 2013

Published: 17 September 2013



Atopic asthma is characterized by intermittent exacerbations triggered by exposure to allergen. Exacerbations are characterized by an acute inflammatory reaction in the airways, with recruitment of both innate and adaptive immune cells. These cell populations as well as soluble factors are critical for initiating and controlling the inflammatory processes in allergic asthma. Detailed data on the numbers and types of cells recruited following allergen challenge is lacking. In this paper we present an extensive phenotypic analysis of the inflammatory cell infiltrate present in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid following bronchoscopically directed allergen challenge in mild atopic asthmatics.


A re-analysis of pooled data obtained prior to intervention in our randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded study (costimulation inhibition in asthma trial [CIA]) was performed. Twenty-four subjects underwent bronchoscopically directed segmental allergen challenge followed by BAL collection 48 hours later. The BAL fluid was analyzed by multi-color flow cytometry for immune cell populations and multi-plex ELISA for cytokine detection.


Allergen instillation induced pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6) and immune modulating cytokines (IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-10) along with an increase in lymphocytes and suppressor cells (Tregs and MDSC). Interestingly, membrane expression of CD30 was identified on lymphocytes, especially Tregs, but not eosinophils. Soluble CD30 was also detected in the BAL fluid after allergen challenge in adult atopic asthmatics.


After segmental allergen challenge of adult atopic asthmatics, cell types associated with a pro-inflammatory as well as an anti-inflammatory response are detected within the BAL fluid of the lung.


T lymphocyteCD30 expressionSegmental allergen challengeAsthma


Asthma is a complex immunological disease affecting approximately 8-10% of the population of the United States [13]. The pathology of asthma includes pulmonary inflammation, airway eosinophilia, mucus hypersecretion and airway hyperreactivity (AHR), induced by specific and nonspecific stimuli which lead to an inappropriate Th2 response [13]. T lymphocytes of a Th2 type secrete IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 [13], cytokines which play important roles in Th2 lymphocyte survival, B cell isotype switching to IgE and mast cell, basophil and eosinophil differentiation and survival [14]. This complex inflammatory cascade is controlled by soluble factors as well as interactions between cell types involving surface receptors such as CD80/86 on dendritic cells (DC) and CD28/CTLA-4 on T cells [59], ultimately resulting in the asthma phenotype [13].

Although inflammation is critical to the pathogenesis of asthma, the exact cell types present in the lung and their differentiation state remain not well defined. In this report, we characterized the immune cell populations and cytokines present within the lungs of mild atopic asthmatics that underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) after segmental allergen challenge (SAC). We detected an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6) and immune modulating cytokines (IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-10) along with an increase in lymphocytes and the suppressor cells, regulatory T (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Although we did not detect expression of CD30 on eosinophils, we did detect significant membrane expression of CD30 on Tregs and the presence of sCD30 in the BAL fluid of adult atopic asthmatics.


Data collected from the Costimulation Inhibition in Asthma (CIA) trial ( NCT00784459) [10] was pooled and re-analyzed for this manuscript. For detailed methods and a description of the participant population and inclusion/exclusion criteria, please refer to reference [10]. In brief, nonsmoking males and females between 18 and 50 years of age with previously diagnosed mild asthma by NAEPP guidelines were identified. At screening, participants underwent skin prick testing of cat allergen extract, short ragweed allergen extract (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and standardized dust mite allergen extracts (Dermatophagoides farinae and/or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) (all from Greer Laboratories, Lenoir NC) to determine their reactivity using standard methods [1013] (Table 1). Eligible participants underwent bronchoscopy with segmental allergen challenge (SAC) with instillation of 5 ml allergen solution at a concentration 1000X the minimum skin reactive test dose, with a maximum of 1:100 dilution of the stock allergen . Repeat bronchoscopy was performed 48 hours later with BAL performed in the same sub-segment in which allergen had previously been instilled. The study was approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board.
Table 1

Allergens used for titrated skin prick testing
















D farinae





D Pteronyssinus





The dilution of allergen that provoked a positive test during titrated skin prick testing is shown. Shown is the number of subjects that had a positive test at the indicated dilution of allergen. 24 subjects were recruited for the initial trial with pre-randomization data re-analyzed for this study. Adapted from Table E8 (reference [10]).

Measurement of BAL total cell counts and differentials

In the research laboratory, total cell counts were determined, cytospins prepared and manual differentials performed immediately following bronchoscopy [10]. The BAL fluid was centrifuged and the supernatant concentrated, using Ultracentrifugation Filter Units (Millipore, Billerica MA), to approximately 1/20th of the original volume, aliquoted and frozen at −80°C for further analysis.

Flow cytometric analysis

The cell pellet recovered from the BAL was resuspended in PBS containing 1% BSA and incubated with antibodies directed against the following cell subsets: T cells were identified as CD4 or CD8, as naïve (CD45RA) or memory (CD45RO), and surface phenotyped for CD28, CD25 or CD30. B cells were identified as CD19+. NK cells were identified as CD56+. Regulatory T cells were identified by staining with CD4, CD25 and FoxP3. Dendritic cells were identified via lineage cocktail negative (CD3/CD14/CD16/CD19/CD20/CD56), HLA-DR high and either CD123+ for plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC), or CD11c+ for myeloid dendritic cells (mDC). Myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were identified as lineage cocktail negative, CD33+ and HLA-DR low. Eosinophils were identified by light scatter properties, CD16 negative and CD11b+. Fluorescently conjugated antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), BioLegend (San Diego, CA) or eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). In brief, 1-2x106 BAL cells were labeled with fluorescently conjugated antibodies at room temperature for 30 minutes. After labeling, RBC were lysed in 1X RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience) for 1–2 minutes and extensively washed in FACS wash (eBioscience). For FoxP3 staining, after surface labeling, cells were labeled with anti-FoxP3 antibody according to the manufactures protocol (human FoxP3 kit, eBioscience). The labeled cells were then analyzed on a 4-color FACSCalibur flow cytometer using CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson Corporation, Mountainview, CA). Samples were gated on a lymphocyte gate followed by a second gate relevant for the population being analyzed (i.e., CD4+) and a minimum of 10,000 gated events collected. Data was further analyzed using Winlist v7 software (Verity Software Corporation, Topsham, ME).

Measurement of cytokine and soluble CD30 levels

BAL fluid was analyzed for cytokine content using the Cytokine Bead Array (Th1/Th2/Th17 kit, BD Biosciences) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The soluble fragment of CD30 (sCD30) was measured by a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) per the manufacturer’s directions (human sCD30 ELISA kit, Abnova, Walnut, CA). The limit of detection of the CBA is 5 pg/mL while the sCD30 ELISA is 0.3 ng/mL.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using either SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) or Prism version 4 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). Outcomes are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or graphically as individual subject points. A non-parametric two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test was performed between pre- and post-SAC data. A 1-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test for individual means was performed when analyzing groups of 3 or more. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.


Inflammatory response to allergen

We re-analyzed data from 24 atopic asthmatics that underwent a bronchoscopy and allergen challenge prior to randomization in the parent trial [10]. As indicated in Figure 1, allergen challenge led to an increase in the total cell number present in the BAL fluid (1.5x105 ± 6.5x104 vs 8.8x105 ± 1.5x106; p < 0.001). There was also a significant change in the cellular composition, with an increase in both eosinophils (28.7% ± 26.2%) and neutrophils (4.5% ± 7.3%), along with a decrease in macrophages detected (−32.1% ± 26.0%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Segmental allergen challenge (SAC) induces an inflammatory response detected in the BAL fluid of atopic asthmatics. In A), total cell counts and differential analysis are presented for BAL fluid obtained pre- and post-SAC. In B), cytokine levels in the BAL fluid were measured by multiplex ELISA using the Cytokine Bead Array (CBA). Shown is the re-analysis performed on the 24 subjects enrolled in the randomized, placebo controlled, double blinded Costimulation Inhibition of Asthma (CIA) trial at pre-randomization. In A (right panel), the average (change in percent cell type) is presented with error bars representing ± the standard deviation with an (* = p < 0.05; ** = p <0.01; *** = p < 0.001). Each subject is represented by a single circle in the graphs with p values presented. Due to pre-SAC cytokines being below the detection limit of the assay (5 pg/mL), no statistical analysis was performed for IL-10, IL-2 or IFN-γ.

We measured the concentrations of pro-inflammatory (IL-6 and TNF) and T cell-derived (IL-10, IL-2, IL-17, IL-4 and IFN-γ) cytokines in the BAL by multi-plex ELISA. IL-6, was significantly induced following allergen challenge (30.8 ± 82.1 vs 311.6 ± 540.0 pg/mL, Figure 1B) while TNF was only detected in a single subject (< 10 pg/mL, data not shown). The T cell-dependent cytokines were not detected pre-allergen; however, IL-2 (4.2 ± 8.8 pg/mL), IFN-γ (6.0 ± 19.3 pg/mL) and IL-10 (5.9 ± 18.2 pg/mL) were detected in some of the subjects (Figure 1B). Neither IL-4 nor IL-17A was observed post-allergen challenge in BAL fluid (data not shown). Surprisingly, most subjects had no detectable levels of T cell-derived cytokines even after allergen instillation in the lung (Figure 1B). An analysis based upon the type of allergen instilled and/or the dilution of allergen that induced a positive skin test did not yield statistically relevant differences due to the limited number of subjects in each group (Table 1). These data indicate that the instillation of allergen in the lung induces the infiltration of inflammatory cells and the production of both pro-inflammatory and T-cell dependent cytokines.

Allergen challenge results in recruitment of innate and adaptive immune cells to the lung

Multi-color flow cytometry was utilized to provide a more detailed phenotypic analysis of immune cells recovered following allergen challenge. An increase in CD4+ T cells along with a decrease in CD8+ T cells was observed 48 hours following allergen challenge (Figure 2). The innate immune response to allergen has also been recognized as an important component of asthma [5]; therefore, we determined the recruitment of natural killer cells (Nk) and dendritic cells (DC) to the lung. No change in Nk or myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) was observed; however, a small yet significant increase in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC; 0.5% ± 0.5% vs 3.9% ± 6.8%; p < 0.05) was observed in the BAL fluid after allergen challenge (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Innate and adaptive immune cells are recruited to the BAL fluid after allergen challenge. Cellular populations in the BAL fluid pre- and post-SAC were labeled with specific fluorophore conjugated antibodies and analyzed by multi-color flow cytometry. The percentages were calculated as a percent of the lymphocyte gate, with the exception of the DC (plasmacytoid [pDC], myeloid [mDC]) and myeloid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) subsets which were calculated as a percentage of the lineage cocktail negative gate. Each subject is represented by a single symbol on the graphs, with p values indicated.

To further characterize the inflammatory response in the lung following allergen challenge, we enumerated the number of suppressor cells present in the lung. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are important mechanisms for down-modulating immune responses to antigen; interestingly, both were recruited to the lung following allergen challenge (Tregs: 4.2% ± 2.1% vs 7.0% ± 4.4% [p < 0.001]; MDSCs: 10.4% ± 8.5% vs 20.6% ± 5.9% [p < 0.01]) (Figure 2). In addition to being present in the BAL, this MDSC population expressed co-stimulatory B7-molecules (CD80 12.2% ± 17.4% and CD86 25.7% ± 12.5%, Additional file 1).

In addition to analyzing the percentage of lymphocyte populations, we performed an extensive phenotypic analysis of these cell subsets. An increase in the percentage of CD45RA+ (naïve or effector memory) T cells (1.1% ± 0.6% vs 5.6% ± 5.4%; p < 0.001) CD4+ and CD8+ (13.3% ± 8.7% vs 21.2% ± 13.5%; p < 0.01) T cells was observed post-allergen challenge along with a reduction in memory (76.8% ± 12.4% vs 70.3% ± 14.8%; p < 0.05) CD8+ T cells (Figure 3). We detected an increase in the percentage of cells that expressed the activation marker CD25 (IL-2R) for both CD4+ (16.0% ± 7.4% vs 19.8% ± 6.9%; p < 0.001) and CD8+ (0.7% ± 0.8% vs 1.3% ± 1.3%; p < 0.0001) T cells (Figure 3). These data demonstrate that allergen challenge results in the recruitment of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and innate immune cells along with specific regulatory cell populations.
Figure 3

Expansion in both naïve and activated T cells in the BAL fluid after allergen challenge. T cell subsets in the BAL fluid pre- and post-SAC were determined by the expression of CD25 (IL-2R; activated), CD45RA (naïve or effector memory) and CD45RO (memory) by multi-color flow cytometry. The percentages were calculated as a percent of either the CD4+ or CD8+ T cell population. Each subject is represented as a single symbol on the graphs, with p values indicated.

CD30 expression in BAL fluid after allergen challenge

CD30 has been shown to be expressed on eosinophils [14, 15], and is associated with Th2 type T lymphocytes [16] and may correlate with severity of asthma [17, 18]; therefore, we analyzed whether CD30 was expressed on BAL cells and present in the BAL fluid after allergen challenge. Contrary to some reports in the literature [14, 15], we were unable to detect any CD30 expression on the surface of BAL eosinophils by multi-color flow cytometry (Figure 4) or by immuno-histochemical staining of cytospins (data not shown) either pre- or post-allergen challenge. However, CD30 expression was detected on a low yet significant percentage of T and B cells (Figure 4) and by immuno-histochemical staining of BAL cytospins (data not shown) obtained following allergen challenge. Of note, the percentage of CD30+ Tregs (22.1% ± 9.1%) was ~10-fold more than detected on either B cells (2.1% ± 2.8%) or T cells (CD4+ 3.2% ± 2.0%; CD8+ 0.3% ± 0.7%) (Figure 4). Soluble CD30 (sCD30), the cleaved fragment of membrane CD30 [19, 20], was quantitated by ELISA in the concentrated BAL fluid. There was a 4-fold increase in sCD30 protein in the BAL fluid upon allergen challenge (3.0 ± 1.1 vs 14.1 ± 24.6 in pg/mL; p < 0.05) (Figure 4). These data identify the presence of CD30 positive lymphocytes, especially Tregs, but not eosinophils, and sCD30 in the BAL fluid after allergen challenge of atopic asthmatics.
Figure 4

CD30 expression is detected after allergen challenge in the BAL fluid. In A), eosinophils were analyzed for CD30 expression by flow cytometry by gating on high side scatter (left panel) followed by gating on CD16 negative cells with eosinophils determined as CD11b+. Shown are flow cytometry plots for a representative subject with CD30 expression on eosinophils compared to an isotype control (A, right 2 panels). In B) (left panel), membrane CD30 expression was analyzed on lymphocyte populations (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and ; B cells □ and Tregs ) post-SAC on 7 subjects by multi-color flow cytometry, with p-values determined by 1-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis) with Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test for individual means indicated. In B) (right panel), sCD30 was measured in the pre- and post-SAC BAL of 10 subjects by ELISA, with the p-value indicated.


In this study, we took advantage of results originally obtained in an interventional trial designed to test the effects of inhibition of T cell costimulation on the response of mild atopic asthmatics to allergen challenge [10]. Data obtained prior to administration of study drug provided a comprehensive data set describing the inflammatory response to allergen. We found that allergen instillation in the airway results in the recruitment of both innate and adaptive immune cells to the lung, including populations of suppressor cells. We also detected elevated expression of CD30, predominantly on regulatory T cells. Thus, the inflammatory response to allergen is a complex mixture of cell types.

Clinical and animal studies have supported the role of T lymphocytes as controllers of the aberrant Th2 initiated response and eosinophils as predominant effectors that induce asthma symptoms. The most dominant Th2 cytokine in asthma is IL-4 which has a plethora of activity including increasing IgE production, and differentiating T cells from a Th0 to Th2 [21, 22]. We detected an increase in eosinophil percentage yet no significant increase in IL-4 after allergen challenge. Batra et al. determined the peak level of IL-4 is reached within 24 hours after allergen challenge [23] potentially explaining the lack of IL-4 detected in our study. In most subjects the majority of cytokines were below the limits of detection. This might reflect the extensive dilution that occurs due to the BAL procedure. Given this limitation, a meaningful biological difference is hard to conclude from these data.

Asthma is a predominate Th2 disease but there is also data for Th1 and Th17 responses. Th2 effector responses in asthma such as eosinophil recruitment, mucus production and AHR are inhibited by IFN-γ which is produced by Th1 T lymphocytes [1]. We detected a significant increase in IFN-γ as well as neutrophils which are recruited by IFN-γ [1] after allergen challenge (Figure 1A and 1B). Thus, our data supports a role for both Th2 and IFN-γ responses in asthma.

Allergen challenge in asthmatics induces changes in both innate and adaptive cellular populations. Although we did not detect increases in B lymphocytes, a significant increase in CD4+ T lymphocytes while a significant decrease in CD8+ T lymphocytes were observed (Figure 2). Furthermore, we observed alterations in T lymphocyte differentiation including: increases in naïve or effector memory (CD45RA+) percentages, increased CD25 (IL-2R) expression, and a decreased memory CD8+ pool after allergen challenge signifying a T cell response to antigen [1, 24]. This is consistent with mouse models of asthma where increased levels of IFN-γ inhibit the generation of memory T cells [25] further contributing to the expansion of an effector T cell pool [26].

We did not observe differences in Nk cells or myeloid dendritic cells (mDC), innate cells important in asthma pathology [5]; however, a significant increase in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) was detected after allergen challenge. The recruitment of pDC may be part of the anti-inflammatory response in asthma [5, 27]. In accordance with this anti-inflammatory response, an increase in regulatory T cells (Treg) as well as increased IL-10 secretion, a regulatory T and pDC effector cytokine, were detected after allergen challenge (Figures 2 and 1B). Regulatory T cells inhibit allergic responses by 1) suppressing myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) important for T lymphocyte activation and differentiation, 2) inhibiting Th1/Th2 and Th17 differentiation, 3) inhibiting IgE production, 4) preventing T lymphocyte migration into the lung and 5) inhibiting effector cell function of mast cells, basophils and eosinophils [5]. Importantly, we further identified an additional innate cell population termed myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) as being increased after allergen challenge in adult atopic asthmatics (Figure 2). Our report is the first to identify MDSC in the BAL fluid of adult atopic asthmatics after allergen challenge. Interestingly in a mouse model of asthma, MDSC were shown to recruit regulatory T cells and down modulate T lymphocyte responses [28]. We also show that MDSC expressed co-stimulatory ligands, both CD80 and CD86, which have been associated with inducing Th2 T cells [3] as well as producing IL-10 [29]. Therefore, multiple suppressor cell types are associated with the anti-inflammatory response detected in the lung after allergen challenge.

Soluble CD30 is increased in the serum of pediatric asthma patients when compared to healthy individuals [18, 30] as well as after allergen challenge in our study. We also detected sCD30 in the serum prior to allergen challenge (20.3 ± 8.0 ng/mL; data not shown) in adult atopic asthmatics. The role of soluble CD30 in asthma is not clear but is thought to block CD30-CD153 induced apoptosis and the induction of IgG class switching on B cells [31]. The presence of sCD30 in the BAL after allergen challenge may play a role in either preventing apoptosis of activated lymphocytes or in their differentiation. However, the role of sCD30 in asthma is unknown and requires further study.

Contrary to reports that detected mRNA and low surface expression of CD30 on eosinophils [14, 15], we did not observe any CD30 expression on eosinophils by either flow cytometry (Figure 4A) or immuno-histochemistry (data not shown). We did however detect membrane CD30 on lymphocytes, especially regulatory T cells, after allergen challenge. CD30 expression on CD4+ T cells has been associated with IL-4 secretion [16] while CD30+ eosinophils undergo apoptosis in asthmatics [14, 15]. Memory CD8+ T lymphocytes express CD30 [32], yet in our study the lowest percentage of CD30+ cells were CD8+ T lymphocytes. This may be partly explained by the decreased memory pool of CD8+ T cells after allergen challenge (Figure 3). There are no reports of CD30 expression on regulatory T cells in human asthma. In mouse model systems of allograft tolerance, a Th2 dominated response like asthma, CD30-deficient Tregs failed to reject grafts [33, 34]. Due to the low cellularity of pre-allergen BAL sample, we were unable to measure CD30 expression on lymphocytes in most subjects. However, in a single subject, the percentage of CD30+ Tregs in the BAL after allergen challenge increased from 0.04% pre-allergen to 24.6% post-allergen challenge (data not shown). The role of CD30 expression on Tregs in asthma remains unclear; however, interaction between CD30 on the Treg and CD153 on a CD8+ T cell results in apoptosis of the CD8+ T cell [33, 34]. Therefore, we speculate that CD30+ regulatory T cells and sCD30 play a role in controlling asthma in a CD30-dependent manner.


Atopic asthmatics increase innate and adaptive immune cell populations after allergen challenge. In particular, alterations in both the activation and memory state of T lymphocytes as well as detection of a novel suppressor cell population termed MDSC. Furthermore, we detected soluble CD30 and identified significant expression of CD30 on immune cells, most notably on regulatory T cells, not eosinophils in atopic asthmatics after allergen challenge.



Myeloid derived suppressor cells


Bronchoalveolar lavage


Soluble CD30


Segmental allergen challenge


T helper type 2


T helper type 1


Myeloid dendritic cell


Plasmacytoid dendritic cell


Regulatory T cell


Costimulation inhibition of asthma trial.



We thank Chandrika Christie for help with the research assays and Jamie Tarsi for assistance in conducting this study. This study was funded by an investigator initiated grant awarded to JMG by Bristol-Myers Squibb Corporation and Medimmune Corporation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA
Current affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA


  1. Cohn L, Elias JA, Chupp GL: Asthma: mechanisms of disease persistence and progression. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004, 22: 789-815. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104716.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Umetsu DT, McIntire JJ, Akbari O, Macaubas C, DeKruyff RH: Asthma: an epidemic of dysregulated immunity. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 715-720. 10.1038/ni0802-715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ishmael FT: The inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of asthma. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011, 111: S11-S17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Asquith KL, Ramshaw HS, Hansbro PM, Beagley KW, Lopez AF, Foster PS: The IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF common receptor plays a pivotal role in the regulation of Th2 immunity and allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2008, 180: 1199-1206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Holgate ST: Innate and adaptive immune responses in asthma. Nat Med. 2012, 18: 673-683. 10.1038/nm.2731.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Deppong C, Degnan JM, Murphy TL, Murphy KM, Green JM: B and T lymphocyte attenuator regulates T cell survival in the lung. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 2973-2979.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deppong C, Juehne TI, Hurchla M, Friend LD, Shah DD, Rose CM, Bricker TL, Shornick LP, Crouch EC, Murphy TL: Cutting edge: B and T lymphocyte attenuator and programmed death receptor-1 inhibitory receptors are required for termination of acute allergic airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 3909-3913.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deppong CM, Parulekar A, Boomer JS, Bricker TL, Green JM: CTLA4-Ig inhibits allergic airway inflammation by a novel CD28-independent, nitric oxide synthase-dependent mechanism. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40: 1985-1994. 10.1002/eji.200940282.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deppong CM, Xu J, Brody SL, Green JM: Airway epithelial cells suppress T cell proliferation by an IFNgamma/STAT1/TGFbeta-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012, 302: L167-L173. 10.1152/ajplung.00188.2011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Parulekar AD, Boomer JS, Patterson BM, Yin-Declue H, Deppong CM, Wilson BS, Jarjour NN, Castro M, Green JM: A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate inhibition of T cell costimulation in allergen induced airway inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013Google Scholar
  11. Weiland SK, Bjorksten B, Brunekreef B, Cookson WO, von Mutius E, Strachan DP: Phase II of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC II): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J. 2004, 24: 406-412. 10.1183/09031936.04.00090303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Romanet-Manent S, Charpin D, Magnan A, Lanteaume A, Vervloet D: Allergic vs nonallergic asthma: what makes the difference?. Allergy. 2002, 57: 607-613. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23504.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pepys J, Roth A, Carroll KB: RAST, skin and nasal tests and the history in grass pollen allergy. Clin Allergy. 1975, 5: 431-442. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1975.tb01882.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Berro AI, Perry GA, Agrawal DK: Increased expression and activation of CD30 induce apoptosis in human blood eosinophils. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 2174-2183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsumoto K, Terakawa M, Miura K, Fukuda S, Nakajima T, Saito H: Extremely rapid and intense induction of apoptosis in human eosinophils by anti-CD30 antibody treatment in vitro. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 2186-2193.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rojas-Ramos E, Garfias Y, Jimenez-Martinez Mdel C, Martinez-Jimenez N, Zenteno E, Gorocica P, Lascurain R: Increased expression of CD30 and CD57 molecules on CD4(+) T cells from children with atopic asthma: a preliminary report. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007, 28: 659-666. 10.2500/aap.2007.28.3057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lombardi V, Singh AK, Akbari O: The role of costimulatory molecules in allergic disease and asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010, 151: 179-189. 10.1159/000242355.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heshmat NM, El-Hadidi ES: Soluble CD30 serum levels in atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma and its relationship with disease severity in pediatric age. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006, 17: 297-303. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00405.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aizawa S, Nakano H, Ishida T, Horie R, Nagai M, Ito K, Yagita H, Okumura K, Inoue J, Watanabe T: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 5 and TRAF2 are involved in CD30-mediated NFkappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 2042-2045. 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ansieau S, Scheffrahn I, Mosialos G, Brand H, Duyster J, Kaye K, Harada J, Dougall B, Hubinger G, Kieff E: Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)-1, TRAF-2, and TRAF-3 interact in vivo with the CD30 cytoplasmic domain; TRAF-2 mediates CD30-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93: 14053-14058. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14053.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Barnes PJ: The cytokine network in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 2008, 118: 3546-3556. 10.1172/JCI36130.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Maes T, Joos GF, Brusselle GG: Targeting interleukin-4 in asthma: lost in translation?. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012, 47: 261-270. 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0080TR.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Batra V, Musani AI, Hastie AT, Khurana S, Carpenter KA, Zangrilli JG, Peters SP: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid concentrations of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, TGF-beta2, interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 after segmental allergen challenge and their effects on alpha-smooth muscle actin and collagen III synthesis by primary human lung fibroblasts. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004, 34: 437-444. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01885.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson JW, Djukanovic R, Howarth PH, Holgate ST: Lymphocyte activation in bronchoalveolar lavage and peripheral blood in atopic asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992, 145: 958-960. 10.1164/ajrccm/145.4_Pt_1.958.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu CY, Kirman JR, Rotte MJ, Davey DF, Perfetto SP, Rhee EG, Freidag BL, Hill BJ, Douek DC, Seder RA: Distinct lineages of T(H)1 cells have differential capacities for memory cell generation in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 852-858. 10.1038/ni832.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Purwar R, Campbell J, Murphy G, Richards WG, Clark RA, Kupper TS: Resident memory T cells (T(RM)) are abundant in human lung: diversity, function, and antigen specificity. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e16245-10.1371/journal.pone.0016245.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dua B, Watson RM, Gauvreau GM, O'Byrne PM: Myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in induced sputum after allergen inhalation in subjects with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010, 126: 133-139. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Deshane J, Zmijewski JW, Luther R, Gaggar A, Deshane R, Lai JF, Xu X, Spell M, Estell K, Weaver CT: Free radical-producing myeloid-derived regulatory cells: potent activators and suppressors of lung inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Mucosal Immunol. 2011, 4: 503-518. 10.1038/mi.2011.16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakajima A, Watanabe N, Yoshino S, Yagita H, Okumura K, Azuma M: Requirement of CD28-CD86 co-stimulation in the interaction between antigen-primed T helper type 2 and B cells. Int Immunol. 1997, 9: 637-644. 10.1093/intimm/9.5.637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Remes ST, Delezuch W, Pulkki K, Pekkanen J, Korppi M, Matinlauri IH: Association of serum-soluble CD26 and CD30 levels with asthma, lung function and bronchial hyper-responsiveness at school age. Acta Paediatr. 2011, 100: e106-e111. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02264.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hargreaves PG, Al-Shamkhani A: Soluble CD30 binds to CD153 with high affinity and blocks transmembrane signaling by CD30. Eur J Immunol. 2002, 32: 163-173. 10.1002/1521-4141(200201)32:1<163::AID-IMMU163>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ellis TM, Simms PE, Slivnick DJ, Jack HM, Fisher RI: CD30 is a signal-transducing molecule that defines a subset of human activated CD45RO+ T cells. J Immunol. 1993, 151: 2380-2389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dai Z, Li Q, Wang Y, Gao G, Diggs LS, Tellides G, Lakkis FG: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress allograft rejection mediated by memory CD8+ T cells via a CD30-dependent mechanism. J Clin Invest. 2004, 113: 310-317.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeiser R, Nguyen VH, Hou JZ, Beilhack A, Zambricki E, Buess M, Contag CH, Negrin RS: Early CD30 signaling is critical for adoptively transferred CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2007, 109: 2225-2233. 10.1182/blood-2006-07-038455.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Boomer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.